Mark Dubowitz

So the Obama administration was very clear under the JCPOA, we are going to pour concrete into the Iraq facility, as Scott acknowledged, because we are concerned that Iraq can be used for reprocessing plutonium, for a plutonium pathway to a nuclear weapon.

Can be used, but we don't know if it was used.

I'm happy that there's no indication for your viewers who are interested in not to plug my own podcast.

So I apologize.

But it is a very good podcast.

I just recently had David Albright on my podcast, who is actually a physicist and a weapons inspector and goes into a lot of detail about the Iranian nuclear program.

Please listen to the podcast.

Iran breakdown, by the way, is the.

Yeah.

And David's the president of the Institute for Science and International Security.

And by the way, he spent decades on this.

And to his credit, he was one of the deep skeptics of the Bush administration's rush to war with Iraq.

That's not true.

He vouched for claims that there were chemical weapons in Iraq and later said he was sorry for it.

Again, I mentioned the Bush administration's rush to war based on their claims that Saddam was building nuclear weapons.

He did debunk the aluminum tubes, though.

He debunked it and was a deep skeptic, again, of the rush to war in Iraq.

You know, the argument today, Lex, which I think is the more interesting argument, because there are very few people

left today who don't believe that the Iranians were building the nuclear weapons capability that gave them the option to build nuclear weapons.

I already said that.