Mark Dubowitz

I just recently had David Albright on my podcast, who is actually a physicist and a weapons inspector and goes into a lot of detail about the Iranian nuclear program.

Please listen to the podcast.

Iran breakdown, by the way, is the.

Yeah.

And David's the president of the Institute for Science and International Security.

And by the way, he spent decades on this.

And to his credit, he was one of the deep skeptics of the Bush administration's rush to war with Iraq.

That's not true.

He vouched for claims that there were chemical weapons in Iraq and later said he was sorry for it.

Again, I mentioned the Bush administration's rush to war based on their claims that Saddam was building nuclear weapons.

He did debunk the aluminum tubes, though.

He debunked it and was a deep skeptic, again, of the rush to war in Iraq.

You know, the argument today, Lex, which I think is the more interesting argument, because there are very few people

left today who don't believe that the Iranians were building the nuclear weapons capability that gave them the option to build nuclear weapons.

I already said that.

We can debate whether they had decided to, and I'm interested to hear Scott's opinion on this, but the recent intelligence that has come out that the Iranian nuclear weapons scientists have begun preliminary work

on building a warhead.

Came out from where?

The Wall Street Journal did verify this.

There's a lot of false claims to refute.