Michael Lazowski

He's talking for other people, whether it's sources or whistleblowers.

Yeah, so, you know, it's really a balance.

I think, you know, for me, I just want to show the truth and what was happening at that time.

Now, I understand, you know, with Jeremy, anything Jeremy does, anything anyone does, to be honest, can be manipulated into however, you know, people want their preconceived notions to be.

You know, but I felt like at the time, you know, his mom and his close family members were really suffering because, you know, he had real threats out against him.

So it's not just him, it extended out to his family.

So I thought it was very important to get them on camera.

So for me, it was really following the truth.

I wasn't trying to, if anything, there's so much in the film that I couldn't, there's so much that I couldn't put in.

But I wanted to really get into what was actually happening and that's why she's in the movie.

I thought it was important.

And again, she did not wanna be in this film.

But I thought it was important that people saw him for who he is, that he has family, that it's not just him that is being threatened, that it's his mom, it's other people around him.

And so, yeah, I thought people had to see that.

Yeah, no, not directly.

I've not received anything like of that sort.

To be fair, I'm not a journalist in the sense that I don't, you know, I made the movie, I'm a documentary, but I'm not a whistleblower.

I'm not, you know, like the people that are actually receiving, you know, these threats, including Jeremy, I mean, they have been exposed to things.

And I haven't been exposed to the level of material that, you know, Jeremy and George have, and I would say other people that have come to them have.

So nothing directly on my end.