Michael Saylor

I think that in general, the mistake that people make is to panic.

The panic, and by the way, the alarmists want you to panic.

The alarmist is saying, well, you know, you don't have a plan and you need a plan.

Well, actually, by definition, the plan is going to do more damage to the patient than the careful consideration of

of the risk.

And so I think the Bitcoin community is pretty rational here.

There's a lot of smart people thinking about it.

They're thinking about all the pros and cons, all the trade-offs.

Like, do I want to go to these post-quantum signatures or not?

What is the impact?

Am I going to introduce a new attack surface?

But I'm of the opinion that if you rush, if you rush and panic, you will probably introduce a greater risk

than if you just think about it really hard and move with a mature, measured, responsible, progressive progression.

And so I'm a progressive there, and I'm sure that we will arrive at the right solution in due time.

Right now, you just have a lot of Twitter trolls that just like to make a lot of noise and they're alarmist.

And I think that's not helpful.

And I don't I would not encourage anyone to confuse getting clicks.

with actually making a constructive contribution.

By the way, I have found, and I study it, you guys must have studied it too, the stuff that runs hardest on X is the not truthful stuff.

Like if you're inflammatory, enraging, or you just make it up, it runs 100 times harder.