Michael Saylor

If you actually post that there's a storm over the Caribbean, but it's only 0.1% likely to have negative impact on Miami, no one's going to retweet that.

Yeah.

And, you know, if you if you posted, you know, we might develop better computers and the better computers might threaten cryptography.

And there's a lot of people working on this.

And, you know, people at Apple and Amazon and Facebook and Google and Meta and 37 other organizations are considering what the pros and cons are of this thing is very interesting.

It's like, you know, most people on Twitter can't read the third sentence in the post.

It's like I've noticed most critics, they can't read a paragraph, much less three paragraphs, much less 10 pages, much less 100 pages.

So at this particular point, I think that

All right, the one thing you could say about the Bitcoin community is they're thinking about everything all the time, very loudly and transparently, right?

Whereas at Microsoft, they're not publishing the internal transcripts of their thoughts about quantum risk to Office 365.

So you tend to have this disproportionate amount of attention to this one network.

And maybe that's a plus.

Maybe it's a plus if we just get all of the smart people thinking about everything for us.

But I got to tell you, the place where it becomes dysfunctional and unhealthy is

is when people start thinking that they need an immediate solution to the parade of horribles that the opportunistic intellectuals or the alarmists want to throw out there online in order to get clicks.

I think that...

The crypto market has really evolved into various segments.

And one segment is digital capital, just long-term economic assets, store of value asset, and without cash flows and without utility other than just to preserve its own scarcity.

And that's what Bitcoin is.

I think that there's another evolving segment, which is these staking networks.