Natalie Winters

And I think that what you can take from that, and you see it in their tactics, they're not looking to have a debate, right?

They're not looking to change our hearts and minds.

They are just trying to use violence.

And we saw that with Charlie Kirk.

The other reason that I played that clip is the way that, I mean, talk about callousness, but the way that that individual, Stephen Levitsky, talks about the Charlie Kirk assassination,

They point to that as something that was unfortunate for their side.

Because the Trump administration tried to crack down on the left wing groups that I'm sure riled up the person who shot him.

And the irony in all of this is that those are the people who are lecturing us on violence.

And again, if you have to create a whole center called nonviolent protesting, that's up at Harvard.

That's what the Erica Chenoweth chick runs.

Maybe you should check the kind of work that you're involved in.

And it's quite interesting.

There's this new term where they're talking about tactical frivolity and

I've gone way too deep in how they describe these protests, but it is an intentional strategy where they're trying to make these protests look very joyful and fun and kind of crazy with the stuffed animals and just weird childlike.

I'm sure there's other pathologies going on there that are animating that.

But some of the research that this Erica Chenoweth chick has done is to try to create these mass protests to be as inviting as they can

From a psychological perspective, some more Americans will get involved.

And just about a week ago, she put out a very long report talking about how Gen Z in particular is linked to forming a lot of these protests, these demonstrations, and how these so-called nonviolent protests very quickly and accidentally suddenly seem to turn violent.

And that's where you sort of get this weird limited hangout idea of the 3.5%.

which I think can maybe be best to understand how they took over the United States government.