Owen Rask

speaker
119 appearances 1 recordings 1 series first heard Sep 2026 last heard 5d ago

Owen Rask’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months
1 · Sep OctJan 26AprJulnow

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Sep 2026 with 1.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment
I think that that's the easiest one to simplify.
You're obviously always going to have overlap between A200 and IAZ.
They're effectively the same ETF.
Don't tell BetaShares or iShares I said that, but they basically are the same ETF.
And effectively, the big challenge that people have here, Oliver, is it's not so much about selling the losers, because you've already identified that that's a potential tax loss that you could take with you.
But the bigger problem that people tend to have, or the more annoying thing that people tend to carry with them, is if they've got two ETFs that are very similar, but they have a capital gain on them.
That's the annoying thing, because you're like, oh, I just wish I could just simplify this.
Can't I just get a private ruling at the ATO and just say, hey, guys, it's basically the same.
Can I just swap them?
They don't do that, unfortunately, as far as I know.
But I think there's not much more you can do there to simplify.
Maybe you could say IEM could be simplified to a lower cost version.
I thought maybe if you did get rid of XUS, there is probably a way to get maybe directionally specific in so far as like a China ETF or a India ETF if you wanted.
Because like emerging markets ETF, that covers it a bit.
But if you wanted more broad or more specific, you could use something like that.
Yeah, XUS
Yeah, yeah.
But because it's covered by BGBL,
And then you've got like the NASDAQ, which has global presence, even though it's US companies.
I kind of feel like be more specific if you're going to have those other plays rather than just everything else for 8%.
Showing 61–80 of 119 · page 4 of 6 ← Previous Next →