Pam Bondi

What it also did was provide a roadmap

into the broader coverup taking place of the Epstein files by Donald Trump, by Todd Blanch, and by Kash Patel, because now we know for sure that the millions of documents that have not been produced

are also being withheld on the same grounds that this DOJ lawyer, Harmeet Dhillon, is objecting to and not letting Pam Bondi respond to after Bondi answered that first question about Donald Trump in a way that Trump and Trump's DOJ did not want Bondi to answer like that.

So all of those other documents we can reasonably assume are being withheld on privilege

And we can also, I think, take a step forward and, in my opinion, say it's our opinion that you're probably withholding all of those documents on the basis of their connection to Donald Trump.

And you're saying all of this is privilege.

Now, this also follows a blockbuster Bloomberg article.

Hat tip to Jason Leopold, who's been really on it there.

and some of the other writers there who determined as well that lots of documents, potentially millions of documents from the DOJ are being withheld that involve Epstein's involvement in many other criminal cases and investigations where Epstein may not have been the central figure, but an ancillary figure.

So wouldn't we want to know all those other cases involving Epstein, folks?

Here at the Midas Touch Network, we bring receipts.

We go through this piece by piece.

Let's do that here.

A reminder, hit subscribe.

Help us get to 7 million subscribers.

Double check that you're subscribed.

So Democratic Congress member James Walkinshaw.

wrote the following.

Setting aside the circumstances of their supposed falling out, you were asked a different question, Pam Bondi.

Did Trump know of Epstein's crimes before they were public knowledge?