Randall Carlson
speaker
1,469 appearances
2 recordings
2 series
first heard Apr 2025
last heard 11 Mar
Randall Carlson’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Mar 2026 with 1.
Appearances
to look back on and to know that much about all the different species and how where they you know where they lived how big they were what they what they did yeah i feel like people yeah megatherium up there that was the side megatherium was the size of a modern day elephant yeah a mastodon was as big or bigger that is mammoth so that was not actually even the biggest of the mammals
Camelops, that was a camel that was again, sometimes could be eight feet tall at the shoulder. The bison Antiquas, they could, they've been found remnants with the, the, the, the horn span was up to 10 and 12 feet.
We don't know. And I think there's so many anomalous things that they don't fit the standard narrative of history. And at some point we got to say, okay, we have to reconsider our models. And this is what I'm pushing for.
I mean, and I'm not, I don't say I'm a hundred percent right about everything, but I do think that there is a much deeper, more complex history on this, especially the human species on this planet. And you know what I hear the, your archeologists over and over, well, where's the evidence? Where's the, you know, what are you looking for? You know, where's the pottery? Right.
Well, we'll look at some slides here in a minute. Here's what most archaeologists don't get. They do not understand the degree of severity to which this planet has been subjected to these periodic remodeling events, I'll call them. Once you begin to understand that, you begin to see why evidence is absent.
Just before we sat down for the interview, we looked at that Google map, and I introduced you to a concept called the Underfit River. Now, if you look at modern civilization, you look at the early Indus Valley, you look at the Sumerian, you look at the Egyptian, you look at these great early civilizations, they all grew up around rivers, right? All of them, pretty much.
Secondarily, they grew up on coastlines. Once sea level more or less stabilized around 6,000 to 7,000 years ago, that's when you see cities, urban areas forming on the coastal regions. And, of course, when sea level is rising, as the great ice sheets are melting, sea level rises. rose from its low stand minus 400 plus feet, comes up 400 feet. Well, you know what's happening. Sea level's rising.
Well, coastlines are then migrating inward, landward. It's called a transgressive sea when it's rising. And of course, when it's rising rapidly like this because of the melting is extreme, you can only temporarily inhabit a coastline. Because within a few generations, that coastline is underwater.
And also, during this transition phase from full glacial to interglacial, the environment and the weather and everything is going to be extremely chaotic. We're going to look at a graph here in a minute that really drives that point home. Sea levels already, you know, you look at that intertidal zone, it's a high energy zone. And it can be very erosive even in modern times.
And I've got some amazing examples of when you have like storm surges and things, the amount of geomorphic work that can be affected on a coastline. During the rapid rising of sea level, it's going to be an order of magnitude more energetic. So anything that anybody builds along a river or along the coastline during, say, the later stages of the Ice Age, It's going to be gone.
There's not going to be anything left of it. You know, and when you see, like I showed you, we looked on the map and maybe if, um, Ryan wants to pull that map up that we were looking at of, of, uh, there we go. This is a beautiful example of an underfit river. Let's see, go to the west, Ryan, where we're going to follow it down. Yeah. Right in there. Okay. Let's pause right there and zoom in.
And you can see that what you've got is that the modern Minnesota River occupies a much larger channel. Now, the old view would be that, oh, okay, well, this formed over many, many, many eons, millions of years even. I had a...
guy once 25, 30 years ago, tell me, Oh, well, cause I was citing this, this right here, because when I was, when I was, uh, 18 years old, 1969, the year I got out, summer, I got out of high school. There was a flying cloud airport, which is up to the, to the, uh, to the East there. And They used to have rock concerts.
I've told this story before, but it's an interesting story and people always ask me, how did you get into this kind of stuff? And there was several episodes, but one of the key outstanding episodes was, you know, I'm 18 years old and I was at this rock concert that was up on the bluffs on the north side of the channel, the big channel.
And during a break in the music, I walked over to the edge of the bluff, which is 200 to 200, excuse me, 250 feet high. And I looked down, and below me, I could see the Minnesota River, and it had entrenched itself into the bottom of the channel.
And then looking across, you know, I saw this other set of bluffs on the other side, and I got this impression that the entrenchment of the modern Minnesota River and its banks on both sides, that this was, I was like looking at a much smaller version of this larger channel that you see right here. Well, that stuck in my craw and marinated for maybe six, seven, eight years.
And then I started reading books about, oh, you know, I think I read Emanuel Velikovsky. You know, his Earth and Upheaval was the one that made the biggest impression on me. that he had documented all of this evidence for great geological catastrophes and so on. I read several more by the late 70s. I had read, I don't know if you ever heard of Charles Hapgood, Path of the Pole.
I got a hold of his book in about 1978, and he had a big bibliography in the back, and I made it my goal to try to track down every reference that he had. By this time, I was... obsessively fascinated. And like, okay, so how come, you know, modern geology textbooks never talk about any of this, but it seemed like earth and upheaval and Charles Hapgood's work.
Well, it looks, I haven't seen any refutation of this, but that was about the time I really started looking into an alternate history of earth.
So, I was giving a lecture on sacred geometry actually to a group and I was talking about self-similarity in sacred architecture that one of the overriding themes that you see over and over again in sacred structures is this idea of this relationship between the part and the whole.
Showing 961–980 of 1,469 · page 49 of 74
← Previous
Next →