Roberto Martinez

Maybe Andrew Matley there would say, no, I can see the contact.

Thank you, but it's not a penalty.

Now, what I don't understand is how someone that is totally away from the game, totally away from managing a level of judgment, you referee the game.

Makes the final decision.

That's not a factual decision.

This is an interpretation.

Now, the interpretation of the referee should prevail.

So I don't agree that the BER remotely watches a referee

AN INCIDENT, AND I THINK WE CAN ALL AGREE WHY THAT WAS GIVEN AS A PENALTY, BECAUSE IF YOU'RE ANALYZING, IS MICHAEL KING'S TOE TOUCHING AND IMPEDING AARON?

YES.

WHERE'S THE BALL?

WELL, THEN I THINK THE REFEREE ON THE MOMENT NEEDS TO GIVE THE RIGHT INTERPRETATION, AND THAT'S REFEREEING.

THE B.I.

SHOULDN'T

over-referee the ref.

It's almost he needs to help him.

And I think that incident is very dangerous because, as you said, that hasn't happened so far.

What's going to happen from now on?

I think you can understand why Lee Mason gave the penalty, but I don't think B.I.

should be used like that.