Seth Paskin

speaker
1,271 appearances 11 recordings 1 series first heard Jun 2026 last heard 21 Sep

Seth Paskin’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months
4 · Jul OctJan 26AprJulnow

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 11 in all, peaking in Jul 2026 with 4.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment
And what he's claiming is that the starting point doesn't matter. podcast-host
It it's inferential and it's then I think you would probably go so far as it is data constrained. podcast-host
So you're constantly refining it with the data that you have. podcast-host
But this is where you get to that, you know, some discussion about Bayesian inference process. podcast-host
Yes. podcast-host
Yeah. podcast-host
I mean I think he might start talking about what on earth makes you think of it that way. podcast-host
If I'm talking about isolating a pinpoint of light, I'm gonna be doing that through something other than my eye. podcast-host
But I also want to again, I want to point out that the what you're saying is exactly right in terms of the way he's describing it. podcast-host
But to me, it's critical that it's not the case that this going backwards gets you to what the true thing is. podcast-host
And that's that's why you would have this foundationalist critique that somehow where you started was what held the whole answer. podcast-host
And the mistake that I think you would say you're making there is the one about the deductive logic question: that you have to have the premises that are perfectly true, and then you can have perfect deductions from them. podcast-host
But as you pointed out, Wes, that doesn't exist for Peirce because. podcast-host
Of well, basically the probabilities involved. podcast-host
That simplified logic isn't the way in which everything in the world is apprehended. podcast-host
It's not the content of cognitions. podcast-host
And so podcast-host
Yes, you have that infinite quote unquote regress, but it's not again that going backwards is not how you get get to true things. podcast-host
Why is redness simpler than any f object or any f physical thing that I would point to in the world, be it an apple, a couch, a tree, a blade of grass, a dog, my kid? podcast-host
Why is redness any different? podcast-host
Showing 981–1000 of 1,271 · page 50 of 64 ← Previous Next →