Steven Bonnell (Destiny)
speaker
516 appearances
1 recordings
1 series
first heard Mar 2024
last heard Mar 2024
Steven Bonnell (Destiny)’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
And then when the international pressure is always, you know, 67 borders, infinite right of return for refugees, and a total withdrawal of Israel from all these lands to even start negotiations. I just don't see realistically that on the Palestinian side, no negotiations are ever going to start in a place that Israel is willing to accept.
So that's a fundamental- Well, what are the standards you think I'm saying to abandon?
That was a chapter six resolution. That's non-binding. But 242 is binding.
If you read the language of the resolution, binding is typically if it commits you to upholding a particular international law or if it establishes a new rule.
But the PLO recognized 181 and 242.
Sure. People can look that up. Yes. The language even of 242 is kept intentionally vague such that it doesn't actually provide, again, the final concourse.
Sure, but the part about territorial acquisition and Israel's need to give it up was kept vague. That's why in 79 Israel saw that they fulfilled their obligations under 242 in terms of withdrawal.
Which is meaningless.
Answer me the question. How close has 242 gotten the Palestinians to a state? How close has the 2004 advisory opinion gotten the West Bank settlement? What's your alternative? The alternative is not this, whatever this making money off the conflict is. The actual alternative. Destiny should talk about making money off of idiocy.
The issue is you have to negotiate. All these resolutions have gotten the Palestinians no closer to a state.
They're not going to be enforced.
And now what options are left after October 7th?
No, but it's part of maintaining. It's the continual putting off of negotiating any solution. They've negotiated.
I'm sorry, I can talk slow.
You can watch your TV and slow it down to 0.5 speed if you don't understand what I'm saying.
Where it feels like there was a good faith effort. Where there was a good faith effort. Where it was a good faith effort.
We have a written record, Mr. Farrell. Mr. Pop Historian, you can't even read the written record. I don't know why you're referring to it. Excuse me?
Find me the information that shows the Palestinian cause has been furthered by any international law.
How do you explain Taba Summit? How do you explain the Camp David?
No, Barak and Olmert did accept the legitimacy of Palestinian demands. They didn't want to give the Palestinians all of Palestine. That's all.
Showing 441–460 of 516 · page 23 of 26
← Previous
Next →