Steven Zuber

And that would be a sufficient other hill to fight on, right?

But instead they choose like this weird fake one.

And I think what it might work to do is convince people to say, you know what, I will start arguing against AI stuff on actual grounds.

Or environmental concerns.

This poster was another one that I read where it was like, because I did some of this research myself a few months ago, but people put together better reports than I did about the energy requirement to use these things.

So to train GPT-5 or whatever, 4.5, whatever it's out now,

You could power San Francisco for a few days with the amount of energy that that took.

Maybe it was a year.

It was some colossal amount of energy to train it.

But once it's there and running, it costs like nothing energy-wise.

100 ChatGPT queries is like driving like five miles in a regular car.

And so I would just love somebody to be like, Steven, how could you use Claude all day?

It's so bad for the environment.

I was like, I don't drive to work.

That's how I can guilt-free know that I have less of a carbon footprint than you do.

But I'm feeling oddly combative.

I think it's because I just don't like bad arguments and that raises my hackles.

But I don't know why I'm imagining so many fake arguments with people.

I'm not pro-AI.

I'm pro-truth.