Stoya

exploited as much as possible the industry and they don't want to deal with the shame or the stigma like sorry babe that comes with the package so what are the questions that you would want answered

So I'm personally very curious why they're using all these like shell corporations in places that shady people do business.

And like maybe that's because it's porn.

So that's all they have access to because porn is largely shut out of normal business infrastructure.

But I would really like to know why.

So they built these tube sites and whether they intended to or not, they devalued the entire market.

And then they started buying up production studios.

And I've thought about this a lot and I can't figure out how giving everything away for free and acclimating people to a porn is something you can have whenever you want without paying for it.

results in a viable business once the dust has settled?

You are the Financial Times.

I suggest you stay in your lane.

You focus on the business aspect.

You focus on the finances.

You focus on who got what investment money, who's in how much debt, how much profit is actually happening, and what the legal standing of these free tube sites should be.