Tom Renz

speaker
588 appearances 4 recordings 2 series first heard Jan 2025 last heard 30 Jan

Tom Renz’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months
2 · Jan OctJan 26AprJulnow

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 2 in all, peaking in Jan 2026 with 2.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment
And the ethics of this are phenomenal, phenomenally important anyways, because at the end of the day, Anything that can read your mind can read whatever is in there. What's to stop it from reading your most private, your most intimate thoughts? You know, the things that you don't want anybody to know. What's to stop that?
Yeah, there's no question. I mean, they've already found out that we're predictable. People are predictable. If you think the same way every time, this goes back to the roots of psychology, conditioned response and unconditioned response and those sorts of things that you know a lot better than me. Especially as an addiction guy, you know that stuff. But we are predictable.
When you combine that predictability with the fact that they can now actually, without any sort of a physical intervention, they can actually still read your thoughts. That's right. This is the most terrifying threat to privacy that humanity's ever faced. We've never had a time in history where you could actually read someone's mind with some semblance of accuracy. And where does that take us?
I think that transhumanism, we have to first make it part of the public lexicon. And then we have to start addressing this because the tech is here. The ethics and the law are not.
Well, and I would ask this, Doc. I mean, think about this. If you can read my thoughts, if you can put something on or near your head and they can pick up those subtle brainwaves and then decipher them, Well, if they can read it, they should be able to write it, right? So you've got a two-way communication.
I mean, I'm not very good at it, but I'm a lawyer, right? So, you know, what they've done is they've taken- Implying you're not good at much?
Or what are we- Well, I'm just saying that, you know, my job's to persuade. I may not be very good at it, but I try, right? So if you think of some of the conversations that we've had, right? So we've talked, you know, you and I have debated back and forth about the mRNA jabs and all these different things, right? Well, I was working to persuade you.
Now, imagine an AI system that's infinitely more brilliant than you or I, that has all the data in the world, and it can just whisper in your ear 24-7. You will listen to that. You will become convinced of whatever it wants to convince you of. And also, you might even get to a point where they can implant memories. They're talking about implanting memories that may not be your own.
You wouldn't even be able to distinguish reality. We have got to get the law and the ethics caught up a little bit with the technology. But most people, when I talk about this, they think you're a conspiracy theorist. They think it's insane.
It's there.
Yeah, I mean, there's no question. And that mass formation, psychosis or hypnosis, it's been called a lot of things. That convinced us that these work, right? Now, the idea that this is somehow going to prevent transmission of a virus is patently absurd. A respiratory virus.
I can put my finger behind it. And somehow that's going to prevent – that was patently absurd. So was the idea that walking the same direction in a grocery store would somehow make a difference. But yet we all believed it. Now imagine if that same argument is made by something that you can't even begin to debate with because of the knowledge-based intelligence. And, you know, when we combine AI –
with the capacity for two-way communication with the brain, and this transhumanist thing is really something we need to be having a very, very open conversation on. The law is so far behind, it's not even close to protecting us in this. And it's honestly a disaster right now.
Yeah, I think we're going to need legislation. You know, I mean, we're going to have to recognize... Yeah, some of this will probably be done through litigation or regulation, but we will need legislation. You know, we got a couple amendments that protect privacy, sort of, kind of, you know, the quartering, the papers, the stuff like that, the third, fourth amendment.
But the problem is, you know, in the 1700s, our founding fathers would never have been able to even conceive of this sort of a situation. Now, you're not allowed to access someone's papers... you know, without a warrant. But given the accuracy, the algorithms and their ability to predict your behavior just based on what you do on the internet,
Well, let me ask the question, what's a greater threat to your privacy? You know, walking into your house and trying to find a piece of paper where you've written down what you're going to do or tracking everything that you do. And then based on an algorithm that gives you, you know, 90, 95% confidence interval, you know, about what you're going to do, you know, creating prediction models.
I mean, right now, yeah, it's terrifying. So it's something that I think that's one of the top issues going forward.
Well, I'm in talks with a couple different people to do a couple different things that I'm almost ready to make some announcements on. So some of that stuff I can't say.
Well, I'll tell you, Doc, you let me do it. I'll come here and I'll make some big announcements coming up. But we're working with a couple different groups. We're looking at health holistically. Of course, you know, we're going to continue fighting the mRNA vaccines for truth and transparency. We want transparency on it. We just want to get to the real science. We want to quit with the lies.
Yeah, well, I mean, there's actually... And I'm sorry I didn't have this in front of me, but I posted a little bit ago. There was actually... They found some... I want to say some enhancing enzymes or something that go along with that SV40 that were not even reported to be in the Pfizer vaccine. That came out, I believe it was a study out of Europe. I'd have to double check. And I apologize.
Showing 541–560 of 588 · page 28 of 30 ← Previous Next →