Tom Schmidt

But it is a good product, so kudos to everyone involved on the acquisition.

Yeah, totally agree.

I don't think there's anything.

I think most people would agree actually with keeping under 16s off of social media.

I think maybe one, the points of disagreement might be having this being implemented by the government instead of parents choosing to have this for their children, which I think most parents are probably choosing to have this for their children.

And then two, like you said,

How do you do this?

You need more ID, AIDS verification, which just ends up kind of this kind of slippery slope.

There's obviously also honeypot for, you know, KYC information.

And so I think that's kind of the thing people, you know, push back on is today it's, you know, ID verification for kids.

You know, tomorrow it's who knows what.

Yeah, I think crypto and decentralized technology ultimately is, it's the ultimate opt-out, right?

A lot of private companies, you know, choose to implement these kinds of, you know, age-limiting features or other limiting features.

I mean, Discord added, you know, age-gating.

Recently,

But it's a private company opting in and they use some kind of smart text.

You're not uploading your ID or whatever.

The problem is when you can't escape, what do you do?

And I think always having an option to let people choose their own path is pretty important.

What am I excited about?