Trooper Yuri Bukenik
speaker
156 appearances
1 recordings
1 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard Nov 2024
Trooper Yuri Bukenik’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
The fact of the matter is you hadn't been to the crime scene by the time you wrote this text, correct?
You hadn't been inside the home, correct?
You had questioned a grand total of three percipient witnesses at this point, correct?
And two of the three were named McCabe, right?
And one of the three was named Albert, correct?
And it's against that backdrop that you wrote, nope, the homeowner's not going to get any shit because he's a cop, right?
At 1057, Bird goes on to write, he, the homeowner, must have been a puddle to accomplish that. And then he writes, who's the homeowner? Then he writes, I hope not, but I can see it. Correct?
A puddle means drunk, correct?
In other words, Bird wrote that the homeowner must have been so drunk, so wasted to have killed him, correct?
And the puddle part means drunk or wasted, right?
And what Bird actually wrote was he must have been a puddle to accomplish that. Correct? That's what he wrote. And then you write back, quote, she waffled him. I looked at his body at the hospital. Right? Correct. You used the phrase waffled about a Boston police officer who had fallen in the snow and died in someone's yard. And you decided to use the word waffled him. Correct?
And then Berg questioned, she waffled him. Correct?
And then you responded, he was banged up. Is that right? Yes.
Then a person with the phone number 0095 wrote, I thought he was drunk. Did he get beat up? You see that?
And you wrote, nope. Is that right? Correct. Yet again, this is before 11 o'clock at night on January 29th, 2022, some 16 hours into your investigation. Is that right? Yes. So before you ever went to the crime scene, before you ever went into the house, only having interviewed three folks, you had this case nice and wrapped up, didn't you?
Super Proctor, I didn't ask for information. I asked, did you in your mind have this case wrapped up? Was it cut and dry in your mind?
Bird then writes, so the owner of the house was a woman cop that beat him, question mark, right? Yes. And then you wrote, that's what I initially thought after talking to Canton paramedics. Is that right? Yes. And then you said, then I saw the guy, correct? Correct.
So what you meant by that, Trooper Proctor, was according to you, based on your initial conversations with the paramedics, the first responders, you were under the impression that this was a beating death. He'd been beaten to death, correct?
Bird writes, something stinks, correct? Correct. And then Trooper Proctor, you responded, yeah, but there will be some serious charges brought on the girl. Isn't that right? That's right. So in that text exchange, you were saying, yeah, we're out to make it cut and dry, correct?
You didn't write, yeah, we're going to follow the evidence wherever it takes us. You didn't, did you? No.
Showing 21–40 of 156 · page 2 of 8
← Previous
Next →