The Longstanding Controversy between Partial Nephrectomy vs. Radical Nephrectomy

episode

Cleveland Clinic Cancer Advances not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

Transrapid, Flugtaxis, Hyperloop – Warum es neuartige Verkehrstechnik so schwer hat 28 min · 22 Sep 2026 · Das Wissen | SWR

In The Lab: Who Dares To Dance With Destiny 29 min · 22 Sep 2026 · Dan Does Footy

Fletch, Vaughan & Hayley's Lil Bitta Pod - 22nd September 2026 6 min · 22 Sep 2026 · ZM's Fletch, Vaughan & Hayley

By Order of the Faithfuls: Celebs? Don’t Need Them! (The Traitors: New Blood Recap) 1h 0m · 22 Sep 2026 · Two Ts In A Pod with Teddi Mellencamp and Tamra Judge

NPR News: 09-21-2026 8PM EDT 4 min · 22 Sep 2026 · NPR News Now

Alistair Nicholson in the studio! - AFL Coaches Association Senior Coach of the Year award | AFLCA CEO (22.09.26) 11 min · 22 Sep 2026 · Whateley

Report any issue

Source

Recorded08 Jul 2021

Publisherfeeds.buzzsprout.com

Handlerec:1648321

Show notes

Steven Campbell, MD, PhD, urologic surgeon, and member of the Section of Urologic Oncology in Cleveland Clinic’s Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, joins the Cancer Advances podcast to discuss the longstanding controversy between partial nephrectomy vs. radical nephrectomy. Listen as Dr. Campbell highlights the possible advantages and disadvantages of each approach and how to know which is best for your patient.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in