Julia Beluz And Victor Montori - Journalists And doctors; separated by a common evidence

episode

Medicine and Science from The BMJ not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

Chris Hipkins: Labour Leader on their policy costings in the wake of PREFU, Adrian Rurawhe's death 10 min · 29 Sep 2026 · The Mike Hosking Breakfast

Nobody Knows What A Coincidence Is 36 min · 29 Sep 2026 · Toni and Ryan

NEW Nancy Guthrie Note?! Teresa Giudice Breaks Her Silence on Milania + Lindsay Clancy INNOCENT?! 52 min · 29 Sep 2026 · No Filter With Zack Peter

NPR News: 09-29-2026 2PM EDT 5 min · 29 Sep 2026 · NPR News Now

2PM ET 09/29/2026 Newscast 3 min · 29 Sep 2026 · Fox News Hourly Update

Deebo & Joe - Part 1: Reaction to Bears Beating Eagles + Maurkice Pouncey Joins 1h 4m · 29 Sep 2026 · Club Shay Shay

Report any issue

Source

Recorded23 Jun 2016

Publisherfeed.podbean.com ↗

Handlerec:13498515

Show notes

The same piece of evidence may reach you via a journalist, or via your doctor - but the way in which that evidence is communicated is changed by your relationship between that person. Julia Beluz from Vox and Victor Montori from the Mayo Clinic join us to discuss if it's possible to reconcile those competing points of view.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in