Julian Savulescu on the 'Yuk' Factor

episode

Philosophy Bites not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

recent transcribed audio

Transrapid, Flugtaxis, Hyperloop – Warum es neuartige Verkehrstechnik so schwer hat 28 min · 22 Sep 2026 · Das Wissen | SWR

In The Lab: Who Dares To Dance With Destiny 29 min · 22 Sep 2026 · Dan Does Footy

Fletch, Vaughan & Hayley's Lil Bitta Pod - 22nd September 2026 6 min · 22 Sep 2026 · ZM's Fletch, Vaughan & Hayley

By Order of the Faithfuls: Celebs? Don’t Need Them! (The Traitors: New Blood Recap) 1h 0m · 22 Sep 2026 · Two Ts In A Pod with Teddi Mellencamp and Tamra Judge

NPR News: 09-21-2026 8PM EDT 4 min · 22 Sep 2026 · NPR News Now

Alistair Nicholson in the studio! - AFL Coaches Association Senior Coach of the Year award | AFLCA CEO (22.09.26) 11 min · 22 Sep 2026 · Whateley

Report any issue

Source

Recorded08 Mar 2009

Publisherphilosophybites.libsyn.com ↗

Handlerec:5661544

Show notes

Should we base our morality on our emotional reactions of disgust? We all have a sense of 'yuk' at some activities or situations. Julian Savulescu of Oxford University discusses the relevance of revulsion to our moral judgements in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related