Menu
Sign In Search Podcasts Charts People & Topics Add Podcast API Blog Pricing
Podcast Image

SaaS Interviews with CEOs, Startups, Founders

895 $10m+ Balancing Act Between SaaS and Variable CPM Revenue

05 Jan 2018

Transcription

Chapter 1: What is the background of Erik Matlick and Bombora?

0.672 - 24.157 Nathan Latka

This is the Top Entrepreneurs Podcast, where founders share how they started their companies and got filthy rich or crash and burn. Each episode features revenue numbers, customer counts, and other insider information that creates business news headlines. We went from a couple hundred thousand dollars to 2.7 million.

0

24.397 - 29.384 Unknown

I had no money when I started the company. It was $160 million, which is the size of many IPOs.

0

29.865 - 51.785 Nathan Latka

We're a bit strapped. We have like 22,000 customers. With over 5 million downloads in a very short amount of time, major outlets like Inc. are calling us the fastest growing business show on iTunes. I'm your host, Nathan Latka, and here's today's episode. Hello, everyone. My guest today is Eric Matlick.

0

51.805 - 61.5 Nathan Latka

He is one of the founders of Bombora and currently guides vision and corporate strategy at the company, bringing over 15 years in founding board and executive management experience to the company.

0

61.941 - 78.467 Nathan Latka

And online performance marketing pioneers insights about the confluence of data analytics, media operations, ad serving technology, sales and marketing processes are the driving force behind Bombora's value proposition. Eric, are you ready to take us to the top? All right. All right, so 15 years, been there, done that.

79.108 - 83.595 Nathan Latka

Tell me about kind of the launch date of Bombora and what it does and your revenue model. How do you make money?

83.715 - 105.356 Erik Matlick

Yeah, so that's like three different questions. I know, sorry. That's fine, it's fine, it's all good. So the history is very interesting. For me, it's interesting. I've done a number of startups. Progression has gone from, pay-per-click back in the day before Google was auctioning clicks. We were the first to market there with a B2B product called Industry Brands.

106.298 - 132.037 Erik Matlick

As things evolved, I started to see that in the B2B space, there was a need for a platform for content syndication and lead creation. So after I sold Industry Brands, I started a company called Madison Logic. Then the genesis there was Really getting into the guts of B2B advertising and lead generation, I noticed that data was a very important piece. And we just did enough of it.

132.678 - 154.252 Erik Matlick

And we sought out to start building a data cooperative or data collective strategy. And that's where the concept of yet another company. And that's how Bombora got started. Which was what year? That was, we spun out about three years ago now. So we'll call it 2014. Bombora will be three years in October.

Chapter 2: How did Bombora evolve from its inception?

314.292 - 333.482 Erik Matlick

And it'll continue to grow. They're both growing. But most importantly to me as a CEO and managing investors, I like the variable piece because there's a lot of upside on the variable piece. The most important part is that the SaaS piece drives more variable revenue. So in the variable piece to us is SaaS-like revenue. It's the same customers.

0

333.862 - 345.677 Erik Matlick

So to get into some numbers for you, we actually have almost 4,000 or approximately 4,000 customers of our data. many of which are not buying from us directly. They're buying through our distribution channels.

0

345.837 - 353.106 Nathan Latka

Does that mean 4,000 are paying you for the SaaS platform, or 4,000, whether directly or indirectly, are using your variable?

0

353.126 - 370.508 Erik Matlick

That's a combination of everything. The SaaS platform is probably in the hundreds right now, and we have an account-based strategy, if you will, where we're going after the largest companies first. So we have a key account list, and so we're going after the very largest B2B companies first.

0

373.863 - 395.196 Nathan Latka

CRMs might be the tool that I fight with the most. I just haven't found one that I really liked. I don't know if you guys are the same way, but they're just so tricky. And a while ago, I had a guy named John Lee on my show. He's the CEO of ProsperWorks. And he told me they just passed 40,000 customers and 24 million in annual revenue. So they're doing about $286,000 a year.

395.176 - 415.314 Nathan Latka

in revenue per employee. And I said, wow, why is this working? And I said, you know what? I'm going to try it. So I went to prosperworks.com forward slash love your CRM, signed up, and it immediately became clear why it worked. Those of you that love growth hacking, you should go to that link just to see how they do the onboarding. That's prosperworks.com forward slash love your CRM.

415.594 - 434.897 Nathan Latka

In short, it's like magic. You know, I'm not the guy that, you know, finishes the sales call and then takes the time to actually put data into the CRM. They have this magical way of just doing it. And it's a beautiful thing. So every morning when I wake up, I just go, okay, what leads are prosper works telling me to reach out to because they're most likely to close and it works so well.

434.998 - 452.183 Nathan Latka

And you guys know, I love money and I love only focusing on the leads that are going to close. So I encourage you to try prosper works or sponsoring the show. Check them out at prosperworks.com forward slash love your CRM folks. That's again, prosperworks.com forward slash love your CRM.

454.728 - 470.329 Nathan Latka

This is very similar to what a lot of ad tech companies are doing right now, where they were all built on kind of taking, it depends on their scale, like MediaOcean, it's less than a percent. Some people are taking up to 20, 30, 40 percent or 40 cents on the dollar of ad spend going through their platform.

Chapter 3: What is Bombora's revenue model and how does it work?

617.276 - 635.237 Erik Matlick

There's a CRO, essentially. He worked with me for two different companies before this. I'm a product and tech. I also worked at Madison Logic. There's a lot of familiarity there. And I had a data acquisition who worked with me at one company previously.

0

635.257 - 638.441 Nathan Latka

So did I hear that right? There was you plus three others?

0

639.001 - 639.382 Erik Matlick

That's right.

0

639.822 - 653.256 Nathan Latka

Okay, got it. And now, I mean, to the extent that you can, because there are other people that are thinking about doing what you did. They're in a company now. They see something they can spin out. They have a little team they want to take with them. I mean, how, one, do you negotiate the spin out cleanly from the parent company?

0

653.697 - 659.863 Nathan Latka

And two, how do you, especially when you put in 78% of the capital, how do you have the equity conversation with your three co-founders?

659.843 - 685.722 Erik Matlick

That's a big question. So the first part is, I was in a good situation. I've had this conversation with other CEOs. And it really depends on your cap table whether or not you can spin out. I positioned it as it was better for everybody. And this goes back to why did we even spin out? We spun out because we were a media business. We wanted to start a data cooperative.

686.082 - 701.012 Erik Matlick

And in order to do that, I had to talk to media businesses and convince the other media businesses that if we collaborated and worked together, we would all win. The problem was that I was a media business. So naturally... they wouldn't work with me until I was a separate entity.

701.252 - 718.818 Erik Matlick

So it made sense logically, and I was able to go to the investors, my investors, and I said, we have an opportunity here. It's not a threat. There's an opportunity to spin out, create even more equity value for the investors if we have a separate entity that focuses on this market. And that's how that happened.

718.958 - 723.364 Nathan Latka

Is the parent company on the Bombora cap table?

Chapter 4: What are the different products offered by Bombora?

729.473 - 735.601 Nathan Latka

So why would the parent, what was in it from the parent company then? What did they get out of all this? Did you buy this piece of tech from them or?

0

736.322 - 757.919 Erik Matlick

So again, so I actually, the cap table of the original company was very similar to this one. It was mainly you. Right. It was mainly me and a bunch of angels. We didn't have a complicated cash structure with preferred shares, all common shares. There was no VC or private equity or anything like that involved.

0

757.939 - 771.6 Erik Matlick

So I was able to do that and prove that it would make sense to spin it out as a separate entity. And at the time, by the way, we had no revenue. you know, we're really, it was in its infancy. It was a little bit more than an idea at that point.

0

771.62 - 779.334 Nathan Latka

So you left kind of kid number one for kid number two. What happened to kid number one? I mean, are they dead or are you bigger than them now?

0

779.654 - 802.693 Erik Matlick

No, no, they're doing great actually. So we, I hired a CEO at the time. I said, that was part of the plan was we're going to spin it out. I'm going to hire a CEO who's, Probably better than me at the current phase of the company to drive it to the next phase. I feel that I'm really good at the idea of a startup, bringing product to market phase. So I brought him in to be the CEO.

803.146 - 821.732 Erik Matlick

He then went on to run it for about two and a half years and then sold the whole business. Oh, great. And the whole business was sold. What did it sell for? Is it public? It's not public, and I can't disclose the price, but there are articles. I believe there's one in Fortune that talks about this.

821.752 - 825.778 Nathan Latka

Just to save me the Googling time, what did Fortune say? It's speculative, but what did they say?

826.231 - 835.547 Erik Matlick

They were speculative that it was – they said something like it had to have been over $100 million because of the filings that we did.

836.069 - 859.498 Nathan Latka

Was it? Guys, I wanted to capture Eric's reaction to that question on camera so you can watch his face and judge for yourself. All right, so good. So that was obviously, whatever happened, successful. There was a good exit there. You're now focused on kid number two. It's scaling. Give us a sense of the company size today. How many employees?

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Please log in to write the first comment.