#354: Problems with the Meta-Analysis in Nutrition

episode

Sigma Nutrition Radio not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

Transrapid, Flugtaxis, Hyperloop – Warum es neuartige Verkehrstechnik so schwer hat 28 min · 22 Sep 2026 · Das Wissen | SWR

In The Lab: Who Dares To Dance With Destiny 29 min · 22 Sep 2026 · Dan Does Footy

Fletch, Vaughan & Hayley's Lil Bitta Pod - 22nd September 2026 6 min · 22 Sep 2026 · ZM's Fletch, Vaughan & Hayley

By Order of the Faithfuls: Celebs? Don’t Need Them! (The Traitors: New Blood Recap) 1h 0m · 22 Sep 2026 · Two Ts In A Pod with Teddi Mellencamp and Tamra Judge

NPR News: 09-21-2026 8PM EDT 4 min · 22 Sep 2026 · NPR News Now

Alistair Nicholson in the studio! - AFL Coaches Association Senior Coach of the Year award | AFLCA CEO (22.09.26) 11 min · 22 Sep 2026 · Whateley

Report any issue

Source

Recorded29 Sep 2020

Publishersigmanutrition.libsyn.com ↗

Handlerec:8153064

Show notes

Danny & Alan discuss issues with using and interpreting meta-analyses in nutritional science, they answer a question about methods of reheating food, and they highlight a recent paper published by quacks that experts have termed a "deception". Today's Topic in Focus [08:50] "I Have a Question!" [53:35] Quack Asylum [59:32] Something Random [66:42] Show notes: https://sigmanutrition.com/episode354

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in