Addressing Some Criticisms of Nutritional Epidemiology (SNP 23)

episode

Sigma Nutrition Radio not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

Transrapid, Flugtaxis, Hyperloop – Warum es neuartige Verkehrstechnik so schwer hat 28 min · 22 Sep 2026 · Das Wissen | SWR

AEE 2691: 3 Tips to Master Past Subjunctive Grammar 15 min · 22 Sep 2026 · All Ears English Podcast

RAW Reaction: 946 Kidnaps Solo Sikoa 25 min · 22 Sep 2026 · Busted Open

NPR News: 09-22-2026 12AM EDT 5 min · 22 Sep 2026 · NPR News Now

The Lake House LIVE! w/ Aisling Bea & Starlee Kine (Classic) 1h 28m · 22 Sep 2026 · How Did This Get Made?

Suffering: A Divine Vocation 26 min · 22 Sep 2026 · Renewing Your Mind

Report any issue

Source

Recorded14 Nov 2023

Publishersigmanutrition.libsyn.com ↗

Handlerec:8152895

Show notes

Note: This is a Premium-exclusive episode, so in order to listen to the full episode you'll need to subscribe to Sigma Nutrition Premium. About This Episode Nutritional epidemiology has faced strong criticism over time. While some of the methodological limitations are fair, often there are criticisms that are misguided and inaccurate. In this episode, Danny touches on a few examples of the misunderstandings of the field and how such claims can be addressed in a more accurate manner. Links: Subscribe to Premium Go to episode page See recommended resources Receive weekly emails from Sigma

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in