Welcome to Episode 4 of UPC UNFILTERED—your concise, AI-powered guide to the latest Unified Patent Court decisions. Based on Professor Willem Hoyng’s authoritative analysis, this week’s episode covers highlights from Week 15 of 2025, including:Dainese v Alpinestars (UPC_CFI_472/2024 & UPC_CFI_792/2024): Critical issues on claim amendments and UPC jurisdiction.Härtwich v Talbert (UPC_CFI_50/2024): Joint development agreements and compensation for unauthorized use of a patent application.TGI v AIM (UPC_CoA_169/2025): Leave to change or amendmend the claim (R. 263 RoP) and the addition of a defendant.EOFlow v Insulet (UPC_CFI_597/2024): Rejection of late filed prior art documents, security for costs.Tridonic v Cupower (UPC_CFI_459/2023): Correction of judgment the details of a judgment.Prefer to read the full, written version? Access the complete commentary here: https://www.hoyngrokhmonegier.com/news-insights/upc-unfiltered-by-willem-hoyng-upc-decisions-week-15-2025/ Brought to you by HOYNG ROKH MONEGIER — we do IP.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related