In this week’s episode, our AI hosts unpack Prof. Willem Hoyng’s expert commentary on the key Unified Patent Court decisions from Week 51, 2025.In this episode, we cover:Sanofi v StadaPharm (Munich LD): A critical look at "reasonable expectation of success" regarding inventive step. Prof. Hoyng questions the court's divergence from the EPO Board of Appeal on reasonable expectation of success.Cardo v Shenzhen Asmax Infinite (Milan LD): An "excellent decision" on valid service under the Hague Convention when the Chinese Central Authority rejects service. Practical Tip: Why you must draft "Hong Kong, China" in your Statement of Claim.UERAN v Xiaomi (Court of Appeal): The CoA refuses a language change from English to German, reinforcing the UPC's international nature.Plus: Decisions on security for costs (Munich), default judgments (The Hague), and suspensive effect (CoA).Read Prof. Hoyng's full written analysis here:🔗 https://www.hoyngrokhmonegier.com/news-insights/detail/upc-unfiltered-by-willem-hoyng-upc-decisions-week-51-2025About this podcast:UPC Unfiltered (AI) brings you weekly audio summaries of Prof. Willem Hoyng's renowned commentary on Unified Patent Court case law. Perfect for your commute or coffee break!Disclaimer: This podcast uses AI-generated voices; minor inaccuracies may occur. All commentary reflects Prof. Willem Hoyng’s personal views.

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Transcript

Related