Facilities Standards Manual Public Review Committee

meeting

Loudoun County Board Committees and Advisory Boards 2h 2m 8 agenda items transcribed 2 days ago official recording ↗

▲ 0

Transcript

jump: agenda · find in transcript

Transcript

Transcript generated automatically by AI and may contain errors.

What is the purpose of the opening and approval of the meeting minutes?

Unknown 0:00

is real i'd like to call to order the october 16 2025 facility standards manual public review committee meeting pursuant to code of virginia section 2.2-3708.3 and in accordance to the board of supervisors policies and procedures on advisory forms commissions and committees dated october 6 2022 and the may 16 2023 Reston, Virginia, and Matt Leslie is participating from a remote location in Round Hill, Virginia, that is not open to the public. They cannot attend due to personal matters. They made their request within the time frame required by the policy, and the county attorney has determined that they meet the qualifications to participate remotely. required by law. A physical form of the PRC is present in the large conference room at 801 Sickland Road and PRC has made arrangements for their voices to be heard by all persons in the large

Unknown 1:06

conference room. Records shall reflect the members participating remotely, the reason, and the location. Records shall also reflect that we are members of one or more effective groups and our respective declarations of interest are kept on file in the minutes of the Facility Standards Manual Public Review Committee. We are open for business. You have no public comment. I think the first item is to go over the minutes from our last meeting on October 2nd, and I understand there were a few suggested edits that were sent in. I'll let you go over that as well. Okay, so we did receive some edits from members. One edit I just made was to call us the FSM PRC. This is an official acronym change from county administration.

Unknown 2:04

So we're no longer just the PRC, we're the FSM PRC, and it might take me years. I'm officially putting it in the minutes, so hopefully it'll stick. So that was one of the changes. Another change was here, Under the DOAM update, it got a little confusing because we have a chair, the Commission has a chair, and the recommendation was to say that the Commission asked the FSM-PRC chair about the deliberations on the DOAM, and he reported that there was a healthy discussion. So that's just a clarifying change to figure out which chair was talking. Again, you see I slipped in FSM-PRC minutes. And then as I go, down here this edit was just to state that the floodway guidance was actually impressed distributed to the committee prior to the meeting to clarify that and then if I keep going this this bullet here there were a couple statements made and that we put in numbers to to say that there were two distinct things a committee member noted that one

Unknown 3:16

there was no designated floodway on the firm, and two, the FIS report states there are no designated floodways. And then it went on to say that, let me collapse this, this was kind of a big change, and FEMA indicated that all floodplain must be treated as a floodway. And so I put the staff liaison board at the MSN PRC on March 27th, 2015 FEMA letter, provided his attachment to, The July 18th point 23 border supervisor staff report following the meeting. Just to clarify that that's. Where we found that rather than saying the no rise floodway guidance and plus. So that was just a clarification and then. So that was the. The last one. Those are the changes to the minutes, unless anybody else has any changes.

Unknown 4:13

Thank you to everybody who sent it to me. That's fine, but if anybody has anything they want to discuss, you can. Approved as edited. So move. Second. Take a listen. Moving in, Derek. Second. Second. Any further discussion? All in favor, please say aye. Aye. Opposed?

Unknown 4:45

So you saw on our agenda, I guess there's two main items we're going to try to tackle today. We visit the floodplain amendments and probably a very short presentation on the 10-year reserve fund. Hopefully more than that. Okay. All right. Maybe you're working. All right. Maybe. The thought on the floodway was staff was going to reflect back on the Floodway, flood fringe, floodplain, narrative, allow maybe some interaction. I don't really want that to go, the interaction part of it, to take too much of our time because we do at some point need to get back into the text.