Anish Acharya

Perhaps.

I just think that the model companies have ambitions in so many directions that it is hard for them to prioritize building opinionated UIs for the legal community.

I also think in many of these categories, again, being multi-model is important.

And OpenAI is only going to ever give you OpenAI models, right?

Anthropix is only going to give you their models.

Same with Google.

So if you are multi-model, rich feature surface, I think being an apps company is better.

Oh, did I say boring wins?

Yeah.

Oh, well, let me make the sort of exact opposite case.

I think weird wins.

Huh.

Yeah.

So, I mean, here is something that's actually very interesting, which is the nature of these models is very different than the nature of any technology we've had before.

I'd say a lot of the technology we've had before, it's quantitative, it's sort of clinical, it can do incredible things, but it's sort of bounded in the range of, you know,

feelings that it can sort of capture.

Now we have this wild, non-predictable, emotional, very human technology, and sometimes it gets pointed in these directions that are very human but perhaps uncomfortable to a big corporation, right?

What is the human experience?

It often involves

disagreement, persuasion, sexuality, and we see that mirrored in some of these AI products.