Brian Buckmeyer

Steele also asked Mia whether she hired a lawyer in 2024 because she wanted to join the MeToo Money Grab against Sean Combs. The prosecution objected to that and the judge agreed, so Mia didn't answer the question. Outside the jury's presence, the prosecution said Mia had endured a humiliating cross-examination, quote, crossing the threshold into harassing and unduly embarrassing.

Steele also asked Mia whether she hired a lawyer in 2024 because she wanted to join the MeToo Money Grab against Sean Combs. The prosecution objected to that and the judge agreed, so Mia didn't answer the question. Outside the jury's presence, the prosecution said Mia had endured a humiliating cross-examination, quote, crossing the threshold into harassing and unduly embarrassing.

Judge Arun Subramanian said he saw no improper treatment, but he did caution Steele about the form of his questions. I loved answering listener questions a couple weeks ago. And you all have continued to call in. We've even had international callers. So it's interesting to hear what parts of this trial and our legal system stick out to you all.

Judge Arun Subramanian said he saw no improper treatment, but he did caution Steele about the form of his questions. I loved answering listener questions a couple weeks ago. And you all have continued to call in. We've even had international callers. So it's interesting to hear what parts of this trial and our legal system stick out to you all.

So this episode, we'll spend some more time getting to the heart of what you want to know. Non-disclosure agreements, or NDAs, consent, and why one of the alleged victims expected to testify may be a no-show. Und am Ende des Videos bekommen wir auch ein Update direkt von Präsident Trump über die Möglichkeit eines Entschuldigungsantrags für Diddy und hören von Diddy-Rival Shug Knight.

So this episode, we'll spend some more time getting to the heart of what you want to know. Non-disclosure agreements, or NDAs, consent, and why one of the alleged victims expected to testify may be a no-show. Und am Ende des Videos bekommen wir auch ein Update direkt von Präsident Trump über die Möglichkeit eines Entschuldigungsantrags für Diddy und hören von Diddy-Rival Shug Knight.

ABC hat mit ihm im Gefängnis gesprochen, was er an Diddy denken sollte. Okay, lasst uns in diese Fragen nachdenken.

ABC hat mit ihm im Gefängnis gesprochen, was er an Diddy denken sollte. Okay, lasst uns in diese Fragen nachdenken.

We don't know whether or not Cassie actually signed a non-disclosure agreement. But when it comes to the general practice of cases like this, the parties typically do sign an NDA. It's probably why Cassie hasn't spoken about this case outside of a criminal setting.

We don't know whether or not Cassie actually signed a non-disclosure agreement. But when it comes to the general practice of cases like this, the parties typically do sign an NDA. It's probably why Cassie hasn't spoken about this case outside of a criminal setting.

And it's probably why, for example, when Sean Combs gave that apology to Cassie after the Intercontinental video came out, he didn't mention her name. Now, when it comes to criminal activity, you cannot NDA those away.

And it's probably why, for example, when Sean Combs gave that apology to Cassie after the Intercontinental video came out, he didn't mention her name. Now, when it comes to criminal activity, you cannot NDA those away.

A person cannot, for example, commit a crime against an individual and say, you know what, I'm going to give you a million dollars and if you sign this contract, you take the money and you can't talk about this. Because if a state or federal prosecutor's office files a subpoena and requires you to testify about a criminal action, that NDA cannot stop you from testifying.

A person cannot, for example, commit a crime against an individual and say, you know what, I'm going to give you a million dollars and if you sign this contract, you take the money and you can't talk about this. Because if a state or federal prosecutor's office files a subpoena and requires you to testify about a criminal action, that NDA cannot stop you from testifying.

And that, at least if there is an NDA in the civil lawsuit between Cassie and Cohen, she would still be required to testify without any form of breach of contract to that NDA.

And that, at least if there is an NDA in the civil lawsuit between Cassie and Cohen, she would still be required to testify without any form of breach of contract to that NDA.

Kelly from Ohio, what a question. Let me see if I can break it down and answer every piece of it. I love it. I love it, because you're really thinking. I appreciate the question. So, yes, you are 100% correct that consent is not a blanket permission slip. It does have to continually happen throughout the action.

Kelly from Ohio, what a question. Let me see if I can break it down and answer every piece of it. I love it. I love it, because you're really thinking. I appreciate the question. So, yes, you are 100% correct that consent is not a blanket permission slip. It does have to continually happen throughout the action.

So to give you a more PG version, if my wife and I are holding hands from the time that I grab her hand until the time that I let go of it, if she lets me, I have to have consent to that the entire time. If halfway through holding her hand, she revokes that consent and I keep holding her hand, then yes, that would be an unconsensual touching.

So to give you a more PG version, if my wife and I are holding hands from the time that I grab her hand until the time that I let go of it, if she lets me, I have to have consent to that the entire time. If halfway through holding her hand, she revokes that consent and I keep holding her hand, then yes, that would be an unconsensual touching.