Brian Buckmeyer

Er könnte sich an ein paar dieser Aktionen engagieren, aber um es deutlicher zu machen, wird er mit dem Thema Transport verantwortlich, um sich an Prostitution zu engagieren. Also die Bewegung von Leuten über die Staatslinien, um sich in diesem Gesetz zu engagieren.

Er könnte sich an ein paar dieser Aktionen engagieren, aber um es deutlicher zu machen, wird er mit dem Thema Transport verantwortlich, um sich an Prostitution zu engagieren. Also die Bewegung von Leuten über die Staatslinien, um sich in diesem Gesetz zu engagieren.

Du bist korrekt, dass wenn jemand die Arbeit eines Sexarbeiters anruft, das wäre eine Anrufung oder Prostitution, aber das ist nicht so, wie er hier verurteilt wird. Wenn es um Sextraffik geht, ist es nicht so, dass du die Dienste eines Sexarbeiters anrufst, sondern du forcest jemanden, in dieser Rolle zu teilnehmen, durch Forst, Fraude oder Korrosion.

Du bist korrekt, dass wenn jemand die Arbeit eines Sexarbeiters anruft, das wäre eine Anrufung oder Prostitution, aber das ist nicht so, wie er hier verurteilt wird. Wenn es um Sextraffik geht, ist es nicht so, dass du die Dienste eines Sexarbeiters anrufst, sondern du forcest jemanden, in dieser Rolle zu teilnehmen, durch Forst, Fraude oder Korrosion.

Oftmals, wenn du die Dienste eines Sexarbeiters kaufst, benutzt du nicht Forst, Fraude oder Korrosion, du gibst ihnen einfach Geld, um diese Dienste zu machen. Das ist der Grund, warum Sextraffik und Prostitution sehr anders sind. Es könnte das gleiche Ergebnis sein, aber wie man es macht, ist sehr anders.

Oftmals, wenn du die Dienste eines Sexarbeiters kaufst, benutzt du nicht Forst, Fraude oder Korrosion, du gibst ihnen einfach Geld, um diese Dienste zu machen. Das ist der Grund, warum Sextraffik und Prostitution sehr anders sind. Es könnte das gleiche Ergebnis sein, aber wie man es macht, ist sehr anders.

Und die Regierung fühlt, dass die Anzeige von Sextraffik mehr präzise ist, als was Sean Combs allgemein gemacht hat. Und Prostitution auf dem Gesicht ist generell mehr eine staatliche Anzeige, nicht eine föderale. Just ahead, what's going on with Victim 3 and could the jury consider lesser charges? More after the break.

Und die Regierung fühlt, dass die Anzeige von Sextraffik mehr präzise ist, als was Sean Combs allgemein gemacht hat. Und Prostitution auf dem Gesicht ist generell mehr eine staatliche Anzeige, nicht eine föderale. Just ahead, what's going on with Victim 3 and could the jury consider lesser charges? More after the break.

Here's a question a few of you seem to be curious about based on the questions we've gotten. The alleged victim, referred to in the case as Victim 3. Victim 3 was in the indictment and she was expected to testify in court. But there's been some reporting these last couple of weeks that even though she was served a subpoena to appear as a witness for the government, she's not going to show.

Here's a question a few of you seem to be curious about based on the questions we've gotten. The alleged victim, referred to in the case as Victim 3. Victim 3 was in the indictment and she was expected to testify in court. But there's been some reporting these last couple of weeks that even though she was served a subpoena to appear as a witness for the government, she's not going to show.

You might be wondering, how is that possible? How can someone just ignore a government subpoena like that? Well, first, we don't know if she's ignoring it, but ignoring a government subpoena is considered contempt of court. That is a crime. Could the federal government force her to come in, send the marshals and go get her? Yes. Could they get her on the stand to testify? Absolutely.

You might be wondering, how is that possible? How can someone just ignore a government subpoena like that? Well, first, we don't know if she's ignoring it, but ignoring a government subpoena is considered contempt of court. That is a crime. Could the federal government force her to come in, send the marshals and go get her? Yes. Could they get her on the stand to testify? Absolutely.

But this is an alleged victim by the very definition of the government. And so do you want to force someone who you believe was the victim of this type of crime to take the stand and force them to testify like that? I don't think so. And so they may not just call her. And they may not try to prosecute her for contempt of court. Okay, last listener call for today.

But this is an alleged victim by the very definition of the government. And so do you want to force someone who you believe was the victim of this type of crime to take the stand and force them to testify like that? I don't think so. And so they may not just call her. And they may not try to prosecute her for contempt of court. Okay, last listener call for today.

EJ from LA, I love this question. Anytime I can be a little bit of a legal nerd, I love diving into it, so I appreciate you for this. EJ, you and I might be a little bit ahead of the class, so let me first explain what a lesser included crime is. A lesser included offense in criminal law refers to a crime that is encompassed within a more serious crime. What does that mean?

EJ from LA, I love this question. Anytime I can be a little bit of a legal nerd, I love diving into it, so I appreciate you for this. EJ, you and I might be a little bit ahead of the class, so let me first explain what a lesser included crime is. A lesser included offense in criminal law refers to a crime that is encompassed within a more serious crime. What does that mean?

I think most people know what pettit larceny is and what grand larceny is. Well, in the state of New York, pettit larceny is theft of anything under $1,000. Grand Larceny therefore is anything over $1,000. And if you wanna get really to the top, like Grand Larceny in the first degree in New York, that's over a million dollars.

I think most people know what pettit larceny is and what grand larceny is. Well, in the state of New York, pettit larceny is theft of anything under $1,000. Grand Larceny therefore is anything over $1,000. And if you wanna get really to the top, like Grand Larceny in the first degree in New York, that's over a million dollars.

So let's say EJ and I, EJ, we're partners in crime now, we go and steal a million dollars, right? In order for us to steal a million dollars, we must have obviously stolen a thousand dollars. And so if the government catches us and they charge us with this crime, they would charge us with both grand larceny in the first degree and petit larceny. And of course all the larcenies in between.

So let's say EJ and I, EJ, we're partners in crime now, we go and steal a million dollars, right? In order for us to steal a million dollars, we must have obviously stolen a thousand dollars. And so if the government catches us and they charge us with this crime, they would charge us with both grand larceny in the first degree and petit larceny. And of course all the larcenies in between.