Dr. Aly Cohen

speaker
699 appearances 2 recordings 2 series first heard Apr 2025 last heard May 2025

Dr. Aly Cohen’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months
No recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment
The Checkup with Doctor Mike · Are Everyday Chemicals ACTUALLY Harming Your Health · 7 May 2025 podcast
Wegen der proprietarischen Blende.
Wegen der proprietarischen Blende. Und ich denke, das muss in diesem Bereich gewartet werden.
In the situation that Dr. Love is describing, where she's saying that the chronic amounts are tested, the doses are tested. We don't know that. You disagree that that exists?
I disagree that we are being made aware of all of the science. See, they're not required to do these tests.
But she's saying that they exist.
Well, this is going to be a matter of... They actually are required to do the testing. Where is this testing actually?
Well, where is the testing then?
Within all of the toxicologists. And is it released to the... Why do you care if it's released to the public? Because you're spreading... Well, that's not the answer. The answer is, where do people get the information that these levels are being tested at parts per million, parts per trillion, parts per billion?
You mentioned the chronic... You tell me where that material is.
These are additive agents.
That is ridiculous. You're saying they're too dumb to care what goes in their body?
Ich meine, das ist, Menschen sollten das Recht haben, zu wissen, was sie in ihrem Körper investieren.
Weil wir nicht wissen, was in den Pestiziden ist. Aber bist du in der Lage, diese Daten zu bekommen? Das ist der Appell zur Natur. Diese Daten sind entweder nicht benötigt, es ist ähnlich wie kosmetische Chemikalien, They're proprietary. No, they're actually regulated by two wildly different organizations and entities and have very different laws behind them.
That may be true, but they're both not in the United States. They're not required. It's not like the European Union. It's not like other components. We are not privy to the components in these ingredients.
So if you are privy, what does that solve?
Es löst sich, naja, es hängt davon ab. Würdest du wissen, was in 99,99% von dem, was in deiner Küche gespürt wird? Ich weiß nicht, was mit dem zu tun hat. I would like that too, but what I'm saying to you is that the problem comes from when these chemicals are created, they are not required by US government to not only test for safety and toxicity, particularly in vulnerable populations.
That sounds like you're talking about supplements. Vulnerable populations like pregnant women, children, elderly, immune compromised. So the point I'm making, if they create the rules... Und sie erstellen die Komponenten. Und sie sind ermöglicht, sie in irgendetwas zu legen, was sie mögen. Das ist nicht überhaupt das, was passiert.
Wir als Konsumenten, ich sage, legt den Halt hier auf und sagt, bevor Sie das in Ihren Körper legen, ohne sich darauf zu erinnern, was in ihm drin ist, warum denken wir nicht ein bisschen darüber, Alternativen zu wählen oder die Ausprägung zu reduzieren?
Aber die Regulierungsagenturen checken nicht, vergessen Sie die Ausprägung, sie checken sie nicht.
They don't have to say that they're even checking. But can you ask? You said you can request the data. Where can you get this data that's transparent that they're going to tell you that they did study it?
Showing 301–320 of 699 · page 16 of 35 ← Previous Next →