Gabriel Mizrahi
đ€ PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
And I'm that person for podcasting and digital media for those people.
So it's more depth, quality over quantity, which should surprise no one who's listened to the show before. It seems like we talk about that a lot on the show. It's common in your profession, and yet people will literally go and meet as many people as they can and collect the business cards. Never get a follow-up email from them.
So it's more depth, quality over quantity, which should surprise no one who's listened to the show before. It seems like we talk about that a lot on the show. It's common in your profession, and yet people will literally go and meet as many people as they can and collect the business cards. Never get a follow-up email from them.
So it's more depth, quality over quantity, which should surprise no one who's listened to the show before. It seems like we talk about that a lot on the show. It's common in your profession, and yet people will literally go and meet as many people as they can and collect the business cards. Never get a follow-up email from them.
Maybe you hear from them three years later, or they follow up, but it's like there's no action here. There's no reason for us to really stay connected that I can think of, other than you're casually maybe going to ask me for something in a few weeks.
Maybe you hear from them three years later, or they follow up, but it's like there's no action here. There's no reason for us to really stay connected that I can think of, other than you're casually maybe going to ask me for something in a few weeks.
Maybe you hear from them three years later, or they follow up, but it's like there's no action here. There's no reason for us to really stay connected that I can think of, other than you're casually maybe going to ask me for something in a few weeks.
Weil viele Menschen messen die QualitĂ€t ihres sozialen Kreises in der Anzahl der Leute, die sie haben, oder Follower oder was auch immer, weil es eine visiblen, tangiblen Metrik der PopularitĂ€t zeigt. Ich denke, Menschen verletzen die PopularitĂ€t fĂŒr echte Verbindung. Und das ist ein riesiger Fehler, besonders in der professionellen SphĂ€re.
Weil viele Menschen messen die QualitĂ€t ihres sozialen Kreises in der Anzahl der Leute, die sie haben, oder Follower oder was auch immer, weil es eine visiblen, tangiblen Metrik der PopularitĂ€t zeigt. Ich denke, Menschen verletzen die PopularitĂ€t fĂŒr echte Verbindung. Und das ist ein riesiger Fehler, besonders in der professionellen SphĂ€re.
Weil viele Menschen messen die QualitĂ€t ihres sozialen Kreises in der Anzahl der Leute, die sie haben, oder Follower oder was auch immer, weil es eine visiblen, tangiblen Metrik der PopularitĂ€t zeigt. Ich denke, Menschen verletzen die PopularitĂ€t fĂŒr echte Verbindung. Und das ist ein riesiger Fehler, besonders in der professionellen SphĂ€re.
A lot of people might know who you are, and that means you're popular, but that doesn't mean that they're connected with you or that they feel necessarily some affinity for you. It's just that they know who you are. It can actually be bad, depending on the industry that you're in, I would imagine.
A lot of people might know who you are, and that means you're popular, but that doesn't mean that they're connected with you or that they feel necessarily some affinity for you. It's just that they know who you are. It can actually be bad, depending on the industry that you're in, I would imagine.
A lot of people might know who you are, and that means you're popular, but that doesn't mean that they're connected with you or that they feel necessarily some affinity for you. It's just that they know who you are. It can actually be bad, depending on the industry that you're in, I would imagine.
That's right. That's totally different. You mentioned in the book, you ask, who has access to the information that we want and how do we structure an approach that they're likely to be receptive to? Ein tolles Beispiel dafĂŒr ist, dass du fĂŒr diese Kampagne volunteerst. ErzĂ€hl mir das, denn du hast einen Platz in der Hauskommunikation gegrĂŒndet. Und du sortierst diese blöden Papiere.
That's right. That's totally different. You mentioned in the book, you ask, who has access to the information that we want and how do we structure an approach that they're likely to be receptive to? Ein tolles Beispiel dafĂŒr ist, dass du fĂŒr diese Kampagne volunteerst. ErzĂ€hl mir das, denn du hast einen Platz in der Hauskommunikation gegrĂŒndet. Und du sortierst diese blöden Papiere.
That's right. That's totally different. You mentioned in the book, you ask, who has access to the information that we want and how do we structure an approach that they're likely to be receptive to? Ein tolles Beispiel dafĂŒr ist, dass du fĂŒr diese Kampagne volunteerst. ErzĂ€hl mir das, denn du hast einen Platz in der Hauskommunikation gegrĂŒndet. Und du sortierst diese blöden Papiere.
Aber dann bekommst du Zugang und Erfahrung mit diesen blĂŒhen BlĂŒten Oberklasse-Folgen.
Aber dann bekommst du Zugang und Erfahrung mit diesen blĂŒhen BlĂŒten Oberklasse-Folgen.
Aber dann bekommst du Zugang und Erfahrung mit diesen blĂŒhen BlĂŒten Oberklasse-Folgen.
Alright, maybe I need one of those good luck pythons. But alas, all I have is an anaconda. We'll be right back. All because no one stopped to ask. Vielen Dank. Ja. Das ist eine groĂe Menge von MĂ€nnern in den Vereinigten Staaten. Das ist eine gute GröĂe der Bevölkerung.