Jamie Edwards

speaker

102 appearances 7 recordings 1 series first heard Jun 2011 last heard Apr 2012

Jamie Edwards’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months

No recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment

Elucidations · Episode 34: Kieran Setiya discusses moral disagreement · 9 Apr 2012 podcast

And they could both accept this.

But the problem seemed to emerge in the first place to a response that, first personally, they both felt that they were responding to the truth.

So what practically can we say in this context?

Is it just that there is an independent fact of the matter as to which one of them is right, but it's one that they can't know first personally that they're onto?

Elucidations · Episode 31: Branden Fitelson discusses reasoning fallacies · 11 Jan 2012 podcast

And I'm Jamie Edwards.

I have to confess that I've read the presentation on this ahead of time, so I

So how frequently do people violate this feminist bank teller inference mistake?

So Carnap was a very smart guy and now that we're looking back on this this seems like a silly mistake to make almost.

Um so why do you think Carnap would have confused the thresholds case?

Elucidations · Episode 30: Marko Malink discusses modal syllogistic · 12 Dec 2011 podcast

And I am Jamie Edwards.

So you've said that Frege redescribes Aristotle's sentences in some way, and this has consequences for how we understand Aristotle's sentences in the light of that, uh some of which might be misleading.

Uh would you say something about this?

Would you say something more about the significance of this result for Aristotle?

Because one of the things we're taught when we study logic is that it tracks

what follows formally from one thing to the next.

It's the formal features that follow.

And it doesn't so much matter the natures of the A's or the B's.

It just matters that the relations follow logically.

But what you're describing is that Aristotle limits his use of syllogism to a metaphysical commitment to certain things are substances, certain things are only predicates.

say a little something about the significance of Aristotle's use of substance terms in the way that you've described?

Showing 21–40 of 102 · page 2 of 6