Kevin McKernan
speaker
709 appearances
2 recordings
2 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard 5 Dec
Kevin McKernan’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Dec 2025 with 1.
Appearances
Yeah, and the communication they gave to Joe was not very reassuring to Joe because they started saying there's no SV40 protein in there. And we never said there was protein. We said there's pieces of DNA in there that are worrisome that they can integrate, and you haven't done any genotoxicity studies.
Typically, when you have something like this, you've got to measure what's the insertional mutagenesis rate. And these vaccines got a hall pass because they redeemed mRNA. They're like, look, it's not DNA, so we don't need to do that, right? Right. But what they didn't tell you is that, yes, it's mRNA, but there's also DNA there.
In which case, if they were honest about how much DNA was there, they would have been forced to go through a genotoxicity study. And they would have had to look for insertional mutagenesis rates. That didn't occur on the mRNA vaccines. So that's part of the crux of the issue at hand.
And so now we're in the stage where we're scanning through tumors to look for integration events and looking for evidence of this in cancer biopsies. And we can find them now.
I'm working with a group in Germany. I was just presenting in Phoenix at a CHD conference down there. But this is what's been most concerning is in this most recent work, we were basically scanning tumors that had spike signals. So there's an immunohistochemistry you can run that's like an antibody that looks for the spike protein on tissue.
So the folks out there were scanning all the biopsies to see which ones had high spike. They found one that had really high spike, sent it to us for sequencing, and we can find components of Pfizer's vaccines inside this thing a year after vaccination. And what's even more- Inside the cancer tumor. It's in the tumor. So it's expressing spike. The plasmids are still there.
They're at about 100 copies per cell. They shouldn't be there a year later. They shouldn't be there at all. But the fact that they're a year later is remarkable. And the fact that they're at 100 copies per cell is even more astounding. That tells us that these things aren't going in and getting degraded. They're going in and they're replicating.
And if you find them in tumors, that's a big problem because we've had this whole, as Yeah, there's a lot of science out there that claims they can't see the signal in the epidemiological literature, but I think that's all bullshit. What you have to look at is the animal models.
Yeah, so when you try to look for signals like this, almost in COVID, if you remember watching the whole COVID debate, they would do these studies being like, well, when we look at excess mortality in Finland versus Denmark versus Kansas, you can make up any story you want as to what COVID's doing.
And it's because there's a lot of confounders, different age groups, different people, different demographics. So what they do when they wanted to dismiss SV40 as actually being carcinogenic, the animal models show it's carcinogenic. You put SV40 virus into animals, you get tumors. So then they backed up and said, okay, let's see if we can see this in people and in large.
And let's look at cancer rates across people that were vaccinated with the polio virus and see if we can see trends. And lo and behold, if you pick the right populations, you can find nothing. It's the same story in COVID. If you want to hide a biological signal, you go to epidemiologists who play these games with bullshit statistics. But if you're a toxicologist, you look at the animal models.
The animal models show SV40 creating tumors. That's all I need to know. I don't want this thing around. But I think what's happened over the years has been a big cover-up on SV40, just like they're trying to cover up COVID and this whole vaccine campaign killing people is that they are –
They're funding large institutions that are tightly tied to NIH and tightly tied to all the people who made this mess to create a mirage that they can't see the signal of SV40 from the polio vaccines because they create these huge confounding studies that no one can get their head around.
Yeah, this might be a faster route because I think he links to them in here. Oh, does he? Yeah, so he's gone and FOID a lot of these people, so these are documents that should have links to the source material. Okay. It might be hard to get these.
Yeah.
But that's a picture of the vaccine right there, the plasmid that we sequenced. So that red region is the spike that's supposed to encode it. When they get this plasmid out of a coli, they will run an in vitro transcription reaction on that to make their RNA. It's a fancy word for just putting polymerase in that turns DNA into RNA.
But what's on the left side of this plasmid is all the shit that shouldn't be there. Those are all the components that make this thing replicate in E. coli. And the corner that Pfizer cut is they left components in here that let it replicate to a million cells. Those shouldn't be in any vaccine. So they have the SV40 origin of replication in there. They have the SV40 enhancer in the promoter.
So Moderna doesn't have that stuff. They do have a plasmin, but it doesn't have any mammalian replication machinery in it. So that's kind of case in point that it was superfluous and unneeded. They didn't need to do this. Pfizer could have picked a different vector that didn't have this risk because their competitor pulled it off.
And their competitor has lower amounts of DNA contamination coming through. Now, I can't say that I've seen data that suggests one vaccine is worse than the other when you look at VAERS. So people are still trying to sort that out. But there is certainly a concentration of adverse events on these vaccines on certain lot numbers. The ELOT numbers are notoriously bad.
We've not yet sequenced those to know if they're any different. And why is that? They were some of the earlier lots. And so maybe they just didn't have their shit together on those lots. I don't have a good answer as to why. There's also some speculation there might have been a different plasmid in those, but we don't know that.
Showing 441–460 of 709 · page 23 of 36
← Previous
Next →