Kevin McKernan
speaker
709 appearances
2 recordings
2 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard 5 Dec
Kevin McKernan’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Dec 2025 with 1.
Appearances
If you look at some of Pfizer's, that other publication I was mentioning where they were kind of bragging about how they grabbed gene therapy plasmids, they were making multiple plasmids in parallel to figure out which one would eventually end up in their product. And it's possible that some of their products are contaminated with the other ones.
I have a hunch that that might be the case just based on the sequence that we got from this colon cancer was not identical to the sequence we've seen in their vials. There are some differences there that are probably very material as to why this one is at such high copy number in those cancer patients. But that's yet to be published information.
We're still trying to get that sequence in other tissues to confirm it.
Yeah, this person was 4X vaccinated. Four times, wow.
All right. That's a couple of points there. So this patient is deceased, unfortunately. A year after vaccination, they got their first biopsy. A week after that, they got another biopsy. And then in four weeks, they were dead. And they got a postmortem biopsy as well. We sequenced the postmortem in the first one. and we're looking at the differences between those two.
There is a plasmid in there that codes for spike. The sequence of that spike is a little different. It's a lot different than the spike that Pfizer has in the vaccines we've sequenced previously. So this has raised a question as to what is really the source of this plasmid, because the differences there have raised alarm bells. It's not exactly what we saw.
Now, we've only sequenced two other lots before, So we don't have good surveillance of all the different lots of Pfizer. They could have different plasmids in each one. They could all be the same. We don't know. We need to do more to sort that out. But there is another hypothesis that could be at play here that leads to a much more frightening scenario, I think, in my mind, which is –
In the middle of the pandemic, there's a paper that was published that really went unnoticed. It was a group in Seattle that showed that their lab people were testing positive for COVID, but didn't have COVID. And they only tested positive. If you remember the COVID test, they actually had three assays usually testing for the virus.
They would look at the spike, they'd look at nucleocaps, and they'd look at the envelope. region. And if all three lit up, they were pretty confident the virus was there. Occasionally, one of them would drop out, like the S-target would drop out once in a while. They had that happen in Europe. It was called S-target failure.
And they would say, all right, we don't really know if you've got COVID because only two out of the three assays are working. So what was happening in Seattle in this lab is only the nucleocapsid test was going off. And that was really weird. And it was in all their lab staff.
So that somehow infected all the lab people, and then it got out of the lab and infected their housemates. And so the paper hypothesized that, okay, this must be because this is a shuttle vector that can grow in a coli and can grow in a million cells. That means it's transmissible. Our vaccine in the lab infected our staff and got out into the wild.
Um, this was another lab leak that didn't hit the radar anywhere. And, um, they kind of wrote it off as no worries. It's nucleocapsid. It's not spike. You know, if it were spike, you know, maybe we could have gotten those people some spikeopathy, um, cause the spike protein itself is really pro-inflammatory nucleocapsid, perhaps not as much. Um, they kind of wrote the paper as, Hey, watch out.
Your PCR tests might be giving you false positives if you're working on these vaccines on the side. Um, But for someone like me who reads that paper, I'm like, no, you just had a huge bio leak in Seattle and it should have been followed up by the CDC. They should have run all over Seattle and looked for this and all their housemates and everyone else. All right.
So there are hundreds of labs around the world doing those same types of experiments where they're taking spike proteins that have been sequenced and there's some differences and they want to characterize those differences, those variants of concern. Right. You may have heard of this, like there's Omicron, Delta, Alpha. Right, right, right.
All of these differences, there is a lab somewhere out there cloning that difference, putting it into one of these vectors and putting them into mammalian cells to see, okay, is it worse or is it better? And that's how they could gauge whether Omicron was like less pathogenic than let's say alpha or delta.
So think of hundreds of labs around the world cloning different forms of the spike protein into vectors like this that have the capacity to shuttle between mammals and E. coli. that means they're like little zoonotic bombs, if you will, that if they get into the lab and they get out, they could spread at their own unknown rate. We don't know what the R0 is of that type of transmission.
It's not been followed. It's not been tracked very closely. But there is one case of it in the peer-reviewed literature already that it happened in Seattle. So that tells me if there's hundreds of other labs working on this, There could be leaks out there that we don't know about. So when I find something like this in a tumor biopsy that isn't identical to Pfizer, my head goes in that direction.
It's that, okay, this plasmid that we found it in is called PCDNA3. It is the most commonly used vector for people to study spike protein mutations. So some lab could have leaked this and gotten to this patient somehow. You can't pin it 100 percent of Pfizer because it's not the fingerprint Pfizer gave to the FDA unless Pfizer is playing with multiple plasmids, which their paper shows they are.
They just haven't disclosed what they are. So we're stuck with two hypotheses here that it could be something that is. contamination in Pfizer's lab that got into this guy's four shots. He gets it. He ends up with the tumor cancer later, or it could be this person knew somebody at a lab. It was a close proximity and got it from them.
And, and that this ended up replicating in his body and, and ends up with a, in his colon cancer in some way. So we don't know, but I think the important message I want to get across to people is that the current gain-of-function debate isn't talking about this. The gain-of-function debate is people like Barak making these full viruses.
Showing 461–480 of 709 · page 24 of 36
← Previous
Next →