Kevin McKernan
speaker
709 appearances
2 recordings
2 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard 5 Dec
Kevin McKernan’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Dec 2025 with 1.
Appearances
But the myocarditis story, I think why John's an interesting discussion on this is that he has the death records and he will tell you the myocarditis is the tip of the iceberg. There's way worse shit going on with seeing the myocarditis.
Yes. And Peter's been backing off of that now being like, they think they may have gotten a way to clear the spike protein now that they can explain. But before them having those treatment options, he was worried that that was the prognosis of someone with myocarditis prior to them finding a way of eliminating some of the spike protein.
But they are hopeful that that number is going to go down with the treatments that they've come across. I think you'll probably find a notice from the FDA about myocarditis. I don't know if they'll actually fit it on those tiny labels. Go to the FDA's website. Yeah.
Update on myocarditis.
This is the VRBAC committee. PDF.
I've spoken at one of these VRBAC meetings. I think this is probably... Okay, go up to that last one.
three uh three days and there's 250 reports this is confusing i don't know what this means yeah what you can see there is a dose response i mean that's what you'll see in so in jessica's paper and what jessica and peter did is they put this through uh what's known as a bradford hill criteria so if you want to try and derive causation from you know from correlative information because
That's where everyone goes to to defend against this is, ah, it's just correlation. But it's a lot of correlation. So what Bradford Hill makes you go and do is you've got to show that there's a temporal connection, that it's within close temporal proximity of the actual dose that this happens. You have to show a biological trend in that more dose creates more problem, which they have here.
right okay um so there's a there's there's about 10 of these criteria in bradford hill that go through that help you determine whether something can be deemed causative or correlative and they've satisfied bradford hill criteria on this one on myocarditis that's what her paper goes through is that okay there's a time connection there's a biological mechanism there's a dose response to this uh and uh and and that that got suppressed for for three years go to the next slide steve 1321 reports what
uh verified using cdc case definition well that's a that's a word salad right there yeah there when the cdc gets involved with case definition they end up uh bearing most of it um but there are papers now out that look at autopsies that mccullough's been involved in and it's something like that's that's the cold hard truth and not enough autopsies were done but when he was looking through autopsies it was something like 70 to 75 of the cases they could pin to the vaccine
Whereas when it goes to the CDC's hands, it's like 7% or something. They start playing all these games being like, well, it could have been something else. But kids don't get myocarditis. This is one that's really overt that they kind of had to cough up. I think where the cancer stuff gets messy is it tends to be sometimes older people.
Um, although that is not, um, holding true with, uh, I was just with, uh, Dr. Maccas, uh, and he was showing that like the peak of cancer is actually like in the forties and fifties. So people are getting cancer like 10 years earlier. They're starting to screen earlier, uh, because of what's happened.
Like they're trying to move the mammograms up 10 years to try and move the colonoscopies up 10 years because, uh, that's in some ways, uh, That will actually hide the signal because you'll get more negatives when you do that. If you open up the scanning window and suddenly change it to 30 instead of 40 for breast cancer, suddenly you'll get a lot more people coming through that don't have it.
And so the prevalence rate will go down if they just move the window around on you. But you are picking some people up at those ages, which you shouldn't be. That's what I think is the most shocking thing. And John's data shows us as well that the age demographic shift happened after the vaccine came into play.
You could see when COVID was in place, the average age of death in Massachusetts was 82. And the average age of death in Massachusetts is 80. So the vaccine was just – the virus was just killing people on the edge of life, OK? And Massachusetts data is really clear. Then when the vaccine actually comes into play, the people that are dying are suddenly 10 or 15 years younger.
That's not – a virus doesn't do that. A virus doesn't suddenly mutate and decide to kill younger people. that's something else that you've added in as a toxin that's bringing it.
Not only does the age demographic shift in this data, the types of mechanisms of disease shifts from, you know, in these older age patients that are getting hit with viruses, they're mostly going down with like some type of secondary pneumonia. What's happening with the people that post vaccine is you're getting clots, you're getting strokes, you're getting kidney failure, you're getting lymphomas.
So it's the age demographic, The age demographic shifted and the type of disease shifted right off the vaccine program, which is a pretty strong signal that this is in fact not a virus changing on us in that regard.
Is that true? Well, there is some. So a person we work with on this was Sin Lee. Sin Lee is probably best known in this field for finding DNA contamination in the HPV vaccines. And I don't know that there's aluminum. I heard Jack say something about that. I have not measured for any aluminum in these vaccines, so I can't comment on that and whether it's in there.
But the older vaccines do tend to have aluminum. And the problem with aluminum is it does bind DNA and pull it out of the solution. So sometimes the tools you use to measure DNA miss it. So it's a great way of camouflaging residual DNA in a vaccine is throw some aluminum in there and all the aluminum disappears. Soaks up the DNA so that the PCR tools don't see it.
Showing 521–540 of 709 · page 27 of 36
← Previous
Next →