Kevin McKernan
speaker
709 appearances
2 recordings
2 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard 5 Dec
Kevin McKernan’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Dec 2025 with 1.
Appearances
And maybe have funding the virus that leaked and suddenly he's in panic mode sending emails to everyone that night like read all this stuff you'll have you'll have assignments tomorrow like we got to get on this and Francis Collins is in there talking about how we have to have a swift takedown of all these conspiracy theories that say it comes it could be engineered and so they're in high gear right now trying to cover this up.
but you know his take is that that um the biodefense program then went to high gear trying to get the vaccine as the only solution to fix this that way they would have a justification for yes something leaked sorry we don't really know who made it but we happen to save the day with a biodefense program having this vaccine ready see the scan of function stuff really needs to happen otherwise we would have been millions of people would have died without this vaccine which is a narrative you hear people try to propagate in the news right
That without this vaccine, it saved 20 million people. They conjure up all of these weird epidemiological studies that try to make that case in their own modeling studies that are easily dismantled. But I think that is a lesson for us going forward that this gain-of-function work is more dangerous than it can ever help. And it is something they need to put a real tight lid on because –
And this – I'm involved on a separate side of this, which is, OK, you found a contaminant in these vaccines. That could implicate fraud. Fraud might unwind the PrEP Act. Therefore, lawyers can now go after the FDA. And the first trial that tried to do that was with Brooke Jackson. And Brooke Jackson had evidence of the trials being fabricated.
Like she was in – she was at Ventavia being asked to like – you know, shift around the PCR numbers or shift around the data on unblind this site and then blind that site. That way they could play games with the clinical trial data. And she blew the whistle on that. They brought that to court. The judge ruled that this was not, yes, Pfizer lied, but they were told to lie by the DOD.
This is not a typical manufacturing arrangement. This is actually a biological countermeasure. The DOD is running this. You have the wrong defendants. So they have to, like, re-steer their case maybe toward the DOD. I mean, they don't know. This is, how do you sue the DOD?
This is just fraud, a different form of fraud. But we expect if we approach them with the SV-40 thing, they'll probably use the same excuse. Like, it's a precedent that they've said.
Yeah, they have a lot of fact-checkers talking about it, which is a sign that they're worried about it. They don't assign – all the fact-checkers you see, if you dig into them, there's some connection of money either back to the Gates Foundation or to a pharmaceutical company one way or another.
They are pumping out – I mean, even the government came out saying they had a billion dollars to spend on reducing vaccine hesitancy for basically marketing their narrative, if you will. Right. when you can tell which topics worry them by how many fact checkers are sick on it. And we're probably right up there at the top.
If you look up the SV40 stuff, they have gotten every one of the fact checkers to write something about it.
Yeah, so that's a good point. So that brings you back to, you know, let's channel Jack here, right? Decentralizing. So peer review, we talked about peer review. Peer review right now is centralized. It's centralized at journals who get most of the revenue from pharmaceutical companies. So they're not really peer review. It's actually a gatekeeping system of what gets through. Yes. Right.
So the way to do peer review in the future is peer to peer. We have these peer to peer cryptocurrency systems, which are effectively timestamping systems of when something was was recorded or invented. So they're ideal for doing peer review. We've done some of this in the past when we sequence cannabis genomes. We've done some projects where we actually were funded by cryptocurrency.
We did the genome, we put all the data onto the blockchain, and we did the peer review on the blockchain. You just recruit peers with crypto and say, hey, 500 bucks to review this upfront, 500 if you finish it, but everything has to be public, your name, your CV, everything has to go public. It happens in seven days. It's the fastest peer review we've ever had happen.
now of course the the traditional academics are like oh you've got money involved and they don't realize that well so do you like when you're right of course when you put in the paper for journal you're paying nature three to five grand to review it none of the money that you pay to nature goes to the reviewers right and it's really prone to bias very prone to bias so and wasn't robert maxwell the one who put this peer review process in place in the first place like in the very beginning yeah so you've read a little bit about this yeah
Yeah. So the good old Mossad agent is the one who, um, who did this. And, uh, and of course he loved what he was, what you can see, there's some similarities with him and his daughter, right? Um, for those who don't know, Maxwell is the same Maxwell as Ghislaine Maxwell is the father of Ghislaine and, and, uh,
What they viewed the sciences as back then, still do very much today, is a way of influencing policy. That if you get all the scientists to the white lab coats together, you're getting the priests of statism together to all sing the narrative you want to, and then you can fund the ones that are saying the right thing, and then you can bend the narrative into your political direction.
Therefore, this is why we have these ridiculous stories about climate change and CO2 and how we need to do all this intervention on changing the Earth's temperature. It's all a game to increase fiat. If you want to step on the gas of printing money, you need to control the white lab coats to preach to the world what the word of God is, and they will tell you to do that.
X, Y, or Z. So Maxwell loved having that. And so he built up Maxwell Press. And that was a way of kind of whining and dining the elite. You'll notice that Epstein did the same thing. Like the people he was whining and dining and trying to get into his surveillance network, he was going all over Boston, trying to get pictures of people who were the biggest thought leaders in biotech.
And a lot of the people I know got like caught with the paper, with like a picture of the guy in the same room. But I don't think, I think they're entirely innocent. The part of his plan is to, the part of the plan, the plan was always to reveal him as a dirty bastard. That way they could control anyone they got a picture with. Reveal who? Epstein. Oh, right.
Like the way that whole that whole blackmail operation works is he has to be not known as a dirtbag for a while. You get him, you know, flashing money around to all these people who are trying to fund their research projects to get into high influence researchers. Like he got somehow he got close to George Church. He got close to Eric Lander a little bit. He got close to a couple of people at MIT.
Showing 601–620 of 709 · page 31 of 36
← Previous
Next →