Nate Swanson

I think both are possibilities.

The problem with sending troops in is it really doesn't change the middle.

The problem with sending troops in is it really doesn't change the middle.

The problem with sending troops in is it really doesn't change the middle.

I mean, it's problematic on multiple levels.

I mean, it's problematic on multiple levels.

I mean, it's problematic on multiple levels.

But the biggest problem is it doesn't really change Iran's calculus.

But the biggest problem is it doesn't really change Iran's calculus.

But the biggest problem is it doesn't really change Iran's calculus.

Iran will just respond in kind by, you know, hitting Gulf energy, you know, hitting more tankers in the Strait or in the Persian Gulf.

Iran will just respond in kind by, you know, hitting Gulf energy, you know, hitting more tankers in the Strait or in the Persian Gulf.

Iran will just respond in kind by, you know, hitting Gulf energy, you know, hitting more tankers in the Strait or in the Persian Gulf.

So, like, that doesn't really change anything.

So, like, that doesn't really change anything.

So, like, that doesn't really change anything.

There's no military objective.

There's no military objective.

There's no military objective.

The only thing that really changes Iran's calculus is massive ground troops, you know, like Iraq 2003.