Sohrab Ahmari

really, really want that to happen because it'll get them a chance to get up close and get far more U.S.

deaths than they've been able to achieve, even if it means they also rack up lots of deaths.

But to them, it's like it's martyrdom, right?

They like glory in it.

So they don't mind that.

But if they can rack up like more kills.

And it provides a static target, too.

If you're landing on an island, it's pretty easy for them to like drone it, you know, and other forms of targeting that they can do.

That's one.

The other, which is, I think, even crazier, is this idea of landing special forces to try to retrieve several hundred pounds of enriched uranium.

which are in tunnels.

And obviously the Iranians aren't like cartoon villains to keep all their enriched uranium in one underground site.

It's multiple tunnel cities across the country where they've placed these.

So the idea of sending in special forces on this, to me, it seems like a wild goose chase.

I laugh because it's, but it's grim because it's also obviously very, very, it's a very dangerous thing to do for those, for the special forces operators.

So, I mean,

Like, the only way to do the really big thing of, quote unquote, defeating Iran is to do an invasion that takes 500,000 troops at a minimum.

And that's what Mark Levin really wants.

It's obvious from all of Levin-type messaging.

It'll become a U.S.