Stephen Miller
π€ PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
Would you answer that question also, please? Yes, gladly. So as Pam mentionedβ
Yes, there's a 9-0 in our favor against the district court ruling, saying that no district court has the power to compel the foreign policy function of the United States.
Yes, there's a 9-0 in our favor against the district court ruling, saying that no district court has the power to compel the foreign policy function of the United States.
I promise you, if he was your neighbor, you would move right away. So you don't plan to ask for it? But the Supreme Court is asking to... And what was the ruling in the Supreme Court, Steve? Was it nine to nothing? Yes, it was a nine to zero. In our favor.
I promise you, if he was your neighbor, you would move right away. So you don't plan to ask for it? But the Supreme Court is asking to... And what was the ruling in the Supreme Court, Steve? Was it nine to nothing? Yes, it was a nine to zero. In our favor.
I promise you, if he was your neighbor, you would move right away. So you don't plan to ask for it? But the Supreme Court is asking to... And what was the ruling in the Supreme Court, Steve? Was it nine to nothing? Yes, it was a nine to zero. In our favor.
In our favor against the district court ruling saying that no district court has the power to compel the foreign policy function of the United States. As Pam said, the ruling solely stated that if this individual at El Salvador's sole discretion was sent back to our country that we could deport him a second time.
In our favor against the district court ruling saying that no district court has the power to compel the foreign policy function of the United States. As Pam said, the ruling solely stated that if this individual at El Salvador's sole discretion was sent back to our country that we could deport him a second time.
In our favor against the district court ruling saying that no district court has the power to compel the foreign policy function of the United States. As Pam said, the ruling solely stated that if this individual at El Salvador's sole discretion was sent back to our country that we could deport him a second time.
No version of this legally ends up with him ever living here because he is a citizen of El Salvador. That is the president of El Salvador. Your questions about it per the court can only be directed to him.
No version of this legally ends up with him ever living here because he is a citizen of El Salvador. That is the president of El Salvador. Your questions about it per the court can only be directed to him.
No version of this legally ends up with him ever living here because he is a citizen of El Salvador. That is the president of El Salvador. Your questions about it per the court can only be directed to him.
With respect to you, He's a citizen of El Salvador. So it's very arrogant even for American media to suggest that we would even tell El Salvador how to handle their own citizens as a starting point. As two immigration courts found that he was a member of MS-13. When President Trump declared MS-13 to be a foreign terrorist organization.
With respect to you, He's a citizen of El Salvador. So it's very arrogant even for American media to suggest that we would even tell El Salvador how to handle their own citizens as a starting point. As two immigration courts found that he was a member of MS-13. When President Trump declared MS-13 to be a foreign terrorist organization.
Great to be with you, Charlie. And one of the reasons I wanted to come on your show is that before we get into all the good stuff in the tax bill, I want to alert you and your listeners to something I'm hearing that I think is very dangerous.
Great to be with you, Charlie. And one of the reasons I wanted to come on your show is that before we get into all the good stuff in the tax bill, I want to alert you and your listeners to something I'm hearing that I think is very dangerous.
So we need to get all conservatives to shout out against this, which is that there are some in Congress, some Republicans who want to raise the top income tax rate. That would be a total disaster for those of us who are old enough to remember when George H.W. Bush raised taxes. And remember, read my lips. It split the party. It did great damage to the economy.
So we need to get all conservatives to shout out against this, which is that there are some in Congress, some Republicans who want to raise the top income tax rate. That would be a total disaster for those of us who are old enough to remember when George H.W. Bush raised taxes. And remember, read my lips. It split the party. It did great damage to the economy.
And it led to the election of Bill Clinton. So Republicans would be making a major mistake if they raised the top rate. In fact, every time in history, by the way, my buddy Art Laffer has a Great book out on this called Taxes Have Consequences.
And it led to the election of Bill Clinton. So Republicans would be making a major mistake if they raised the top rate. In fact, every time in history, by the way, my buddy Art Laffer has a Great book out on this called Taxes Have Consequences.