Stephen Neale on Meaning and Interpretation

episode

Philosophy Bites not yet transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

This episode hasn't been transcribed yet Upvotes decide what gets transcribed next — 0 so far. Sign in to upvote

Related

recent transcribed audio

Transrapid, Flugtaxis, Hyperloop – Warum es neuartige Verkehrstechnik so schwer hat 28 min · 22 Sep 2026 · Das Wissen | SWR

Who Loves Themselves More?! (RHUGT Recap) 37 min · 21 Sep 2026 · Two Ts In A Pod with Teddi Mellencamp and Tamra Judge

NHL Insider Frank Seravalli (9/21/26) 18 min · 21 Sep 2026 · Oilers NOW with Bob Stauffer

WarRoom Battleground EP 1091: Mainstream Meltdown Over RAV Being Pool Feed Cont. 54 min · 21 Sep 2026 · Bannon`s War Room

Episode 5679: Mainstream Meltdown Over RAV Being Pool Feed; Countdown To Thursday's Xi Meeting 1h 0m · 21 Sep 2026 · Bannon`s War Room

Paramount Settles States’ Antitrust Lawsuit. Plus, ‘Lanterns’ Episode 6. 1h 0m · 21 Sep 2026 · The Watch

Report any issue

Source

Recorded18 Jul 2010

Publisherphilosophybites.libsyn.com ↗

Handlerec:5661508

Show notes

We interpret each others' words all the time. How do we do this? What part do intentions play? Does this have any implications for interpreting laws? Stephen Neale discusses these issues in conversation with Nigel Warburton in this episode of the Philosophy Bites podcast. Philosophy Bites is made in assocation with the Institute of Philosophy - for further information about the Institute see www.philosophy.sas.ac.uk

Ask this episode

“What did the council decide on item 42?” — answered with the speaker and the moment.

Sign in