Dr. Andy Galpin

I will just say fairly well-trained scientist at this point in my career. That's actually really powerful because you didn't do it at the right time. You didn't control for those things and you still saw a statistically significant, albeit mild, benefit. I think most people listening would say, I will take a mild reduction in my daily pain.

For a 50-calorie snack? Yeah, and the cognitive side.

For a 50-calorie snack? Yeah, and the cognitive side.

So the last question I have for you on that particular study was, and I know everyone listening has been waiting for me to ask this or hoping I would, how did 10 work better than 20?

So the last question I have for you on that particular study was, and I know everyone listening has been waiting for me to ask this or hoping I would, how did 10 work better than 20?

Right. It's interesting because rarely with protein, and albeit collagen is not the same thing as whey protein— I just can't think of too many situations in which when you go more than, you had a lesser effect.

Right. It's interesting because rarely with protein, and albeit collagen is not the same thing as whey protein— I just can't think of too many situations in which when you go more than, you had a lesser effect.

It's almost always the more protein or protein-like, the more amino acids, the more anything in this space, either you get a benefit or you at worst get a, maybe not a greater increase in benefit relative to, to the greater increase in, in substrate or volume or food or calories. But in this case, you actually see a dampered effect.

It's almost always the more protein or protein-like, the more amino acids, the more anything in this space, either you get a benefit or you at worst get a, maybe not a greater increase in benefit relative to, to the greater increase in, in substrate or volume or food or calories. But in this case, you actually see a dampered effect.

Struggling to answer a review question.

Struggling to answer a review question.

I think that's... It's honestly... And I don't mean this... I know you won't take it this way, but it's also very plausible it's artifact. No doubt. As in, it might not be a real genuine finding. You... Weird things can happen, right? And this is why another thing you said earlier as a passing comment that I want to pull out is another great sign of a phenomenal scientist.

I think that's... It's honestly... And I don't mean this... I know you won't take it this way, but it's also very plausible it's artifact. No doubt. As in, it might not be a real genuine finding. You... Weird things can happen, right? And this is why another thing you said earlier as a passing comment that I want to pull out is another great sign of a phenomenal scientist.

You mentioned a study coming from one lab before, and you say, okay... You would say the same thing I know you would about your lab. Oh, for sure. So don't over-interpret this nine-month study. Right. Right? It's like, well, let's see another lab. Repeat it. Let's do different circumstances.

You mentioned a study coming from one lab before, and you say, okay... You would say the same thing I know you would about your lab. Oh, for sure. So don't over-interpret this nine-month study. Right. Right? It's like, well, let's see another lab. Repeat it. Let's do different circumstances.

Okay. Well, for the record, I'm going to keep taking 20. I don't care what your data say. I'm not kidding. I'm not stopping it at all. It's too much of a potential win. But I'll be honest. One of the major reasons I changed my position in this field was your paper. Once I saw your name, that kind of a study on – I was like, okay.

Okay. Well, for the record, I'm going to keep taking 20. I don't care what your data say. I'm not kidding. I'm not stopping it at all. It's too much of a potential win. But I'll be honest. One of the major reasons I changed my position in this field was your paper. Once I saw your name, that kind of a study on – I was like, okay.

Now I can start believing this data because it's not against the other scientists who were publishing earlier with you, but it's just the fact that I now saw it on multiple labs, a lab I recognize, and the data were believable. And what I mean by that is when you do real-world studies, you rarely see everything works every time. Right.

Now I can start believing this data because it's not against the other scientists who were publishing earlier with you, but it's just the fact that I now saw it on multiple labs, a lab I recognize, and the data were believable. And what I mean by that is when you do real-world studies, you rarely see everything works every time. Right.

It's like, well, maybe joint pain went down, but they slept worse. Or this marker in the blood went up, and this other marker went up, and then this one didn't. Right. And anytime I see a paper where like everything gets better, I'm always like, no, no way.