Episode 5158: The Battle In Georgia Has Just Begun; Fight Against Roundup

episode

Bannon`s War Room 55 min 9 speakers 8 chapters transcribed

▲ 0

Transcript

jump: chapters · speakers · find in transcript

Transcript

Transcript generated automatically by AI and may contain errors.

What does the primal scream of a dying regime signify?

Unknown 0:02

This is the primal scream of a dying regime. Pray for our enemies, because we're going medieval on these people. I got a free shot on all these networks lying about the people. The people have had a belly full of it. I know you don't like hearing that. I know you've tried to do everything in the world to stop that, but you're not going to stop it. It's going to happen. And where do people like that go to share the big lie? Mega media. I wish in my soul, I wish that any of these people had a conscience.

Stephen K. Bannon 0:34

Ask yourself, what is my task and what is my purpose? If that answer is to save my country, this country will be saved.

Unknown 0:44

War Room. Here's your host, Stephen K. Bann.

Stephen K. Bannon 0:53

Okay, bombshell ruling a moment ago.

How is the fight against Roundup relevant to the current political landscape?

Stephen K. Bannon 0:55

It is Friday, the 21st of February, the year of our Lord, 2026. Bombshell ruling moments ago, 6-3. Overruling or saying unconstitutional President Trump's emergency tariffs that he used IEPA to say it's a national security issue. It is a national security issue. This is going to have massive, massive implications. We talk about economic warfare and we talk about – the ability to kind of manage what's happening in Iran right now. If you just leave the United States with military force, I don't know. This is going to have massive consequences. And now I understand that the – about getting the money back or what's going to happen, they're going to push that down to federal court. So now we're going to be tied up on that for years.

Stephen K. Bannon 1:43

Anyway, President, waiting for the White House to give some guidance here. Peter Navarro was going to join us today about the – missing GDP because of the Democrat shutdown. Democrats realize they have leverage here and they're going to use that leverage.

What implications does the Supreme Court ruling have on economic warfare?

Stephen K. Bannon 1:57

Do they have leverage in Georgia to make sure they get past the 2020 election and sorting this mess out so 2026 cannot be stolen? Harry, just give me a minute. You've made the statement that this is criminal. You believe this is criminal, not just some sort of incompetence, not people that should have known better but didn't. not people that were working hard and the data just didn't set up. You're saying, number one, 2020 was not certifiable, and you believe it was not certifiable because of actual criminal activity. Did I read that correctly?

Harry 2:31

Correct. I mean, the problem here is that between the missing digital signatures and the and another piece where the early voting tabulator tapes are not retained, you don't have any provenance that's required by state law on these ballots. There's over 300,000 ballots that were counted, and there's two aspects of this. The first is that they were counted even though they had tainted provenance. If this was an election, not an election, but a criminal evidence locker, for instance, this data would not be admissible in court. I mean, the whole provenance behind it has been destroyed.

What are the consequences of the 2020 election being deemed untrustworthy?

Harry 3:17

The second piece though that's staggering is that they know this at the time that they are submitting these counts for accumulation in the statewide voting system. At that moment in time, they make a choice. It's a conscious choice to put illegal ballots. That's what they're called. They don't have the proper legal authorization to be counted. They make the choice to count them. Over 315,000 ballots in Georgia should never have been counted. And why do we know it's a choice? Because it was still reversible. They could have recounted all 315,000 and corrected whatever problem. Let's say it's not malice, even though it looks like malice, frankly, from an expert perspective. But the fact of the matter is, let's say it was just an accident.

Harry 4:07

They decide to throw these 315,000 broken ballots into the system and count them anyway. This is a conscious choice, not an act.

Stephen K. Bannon 4:17

Okay, this is so important.

How do missing digital signatures affect the integrity of ballots?

Stephen K. Bannon 4:19

And make sure you pull this clip, Grace and Moe, and push it because every time they say they go, well, there was this 300,000 thing we just found out about, but that was just a clerical error and didn't mean anything. This is what they're trying to do. Harry, I want everybody to go over to your site.